Conspiracy Theories 101 Series
Part 10 of 12:
The Conspiracy Against
Visible Minorities
Part 3
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 1 of 12: Introduction
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 2 of 12: The Deep State
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 3 of 12: Conspiracy Theorists - Part 1 and Part 2
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 4 of 12: Pedophile Rings
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 5 of 12: The Surveillance State
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 6 of 12: The Banking State
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 7 of 12: The Environmental Movement
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 8 of 12: Breaking Up the Family Unit
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 9 of 12: The Conspiracy Against Women - Part 1 and Part 2
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 10 of 12: The Conspiracy Against Visible Minorities - Part 1 and Part 2 and Part 3 and Part 4
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 11 of 12: The Media - Part 1 and Part 2
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 12 of 12: The Stigma of Being a Conspiracy Theorist - Part 1 and Part 2
By: Shawn Alli
Posted: October 10, 2017
Updated: July 2, 2022
*This article was updated in July 2022 because the original web pages were too large to be indexed by Google.
*Note: All individuals and organizations receive 3 full days of pre-publication notice.
*Note: By Jewish people/Jews, I'm referring to Israeli ethnicity, not Judaist believers.
*Note: The use of the terms genotype and phenotype is not in their proper scientific use, but it will suffice for mainstream science.
*Note: All dollar figures are in US dollars unless specified otherwise.
*Note: I use the term liberal trifecta to refer to liberals in general, liberal/progressive/neo-liberal media outlets, and Democrats.
Free Speech & The Rise of Trump & White Supremacy
Black Lives Matter (BLM)
Visible Minorities Who Want to be White
Free Speech & The Rise of Trump & White Supremacy
Let's get right into it. Trump's 2016 win was the moment that white supremacists have longed for. One pure white king to rule them all without any regard for anyone but white people. The promise land.
Some white racists want a true white homeland. Others want exclusionary opportunities. Others want both. And some want more than that. It's tough to generalize, but when writing about any type of group you have to generalize and lump people into categories that are not necessarily accurate.
With the election of Trump, white supremacists feel that they can finally throw off the liberal shackles of political correctness and bring their racism out into the open. It's a bold move. And oddly enough, one that I recommend. Allow me to explain.
In the 8 years under the Obama administration, white supremacists and your average white racist more or less keeps their views to themselves and don't cause much of a fuss (aside from isolated incidents). With America's ingrained racism, white supremacists could have caused a lot more problems. But they didn't.
While holding your ideologies in or not translating them into actions for 8 years is impressive, it's not a genuine action. If you don't believe in X, don't pretend that you do. If you believe in Y, be honest about your belief in Y. Holding in ones ideologies is not only disingenuous, but prevents real growth from occurring, at the individual and global level.
While liberal white people think that white racists should just get over it, that's not going to happen. Genuine change doesn't occur (in the past or present) because of political correctness. It occurs because a person becomes aware of why they hold ideology X and whether that reason, that why, is still valid.
The events in Charlottesville, Virginia are just a microcosm of the larger issue. And contrary to what the liberal trifecta claims, the situation won’t be resolved by political correctness, censorship, or education. Ideologies transcend all of those structures.
Ideologies are not physical things. They can't be killed or destroyed. They can only be suppressed, dormant, or expressed. There's no in-between. And white supremacists believe, rightly so, that this is the correct time to express their ideologies after suppressing it for 8 years and longer.
White supremacists have been waiting for a strong white man to lead them back to the glory days of white supremacy/nationalism...where only beautiful white people matter...where they get priority over everyone else...where they're the only ones who shape and define history. And yet, objectively speaking, white people already have these characteristics in the past and present:
Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Machivelli (founders of WE philosophy/governance/structure)
Issac Newton (physics)
Albert Einstein (physics)
James Watson (discover of DNA)
Luc Montagnier (discover of HIV virus)
Elon Musk (creator reusable rockets and hyperloop idea)
Tim Berners-Lee (creator www protocol and first web browser)
Mark Zuckerberg (creator of Facebook, social communication revolution)
Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier (gene editing...debatable due to courts).
All of these inventions/services/ideologies are created by WE white people (including Jews). It's not unfair to say that white people are more or less responsible for the world we live in today. While it's created on the backs of slaves, it's white colonizers that conquer visible minorities in the past. Not the other way around.
I hate to admit it, but white supremacists have a strong argument in favor of seeing themselves as the creators/innovators that move humanity forward. You may not like hearing that, but you can't deny history and reality.
Oddly enough, white supremacists feel disenfranchised because of visible minorities. When in reality, real visible minorities (not including Jews), have no significant power in WE society. People of color are not holding back white supremacists. Sorry, but we don't have that kind of power. And yet white supremacists feel that we do, or that we have access to that power. Hilarious and tragic at the same time.
Objectively speaking, a white man can go from homeless to a billionaire in less than 5 years (through legal means). But a visible minority wouldn't be able to achieve that. They might be able to achieve it in a decade, but only through illegal means. Why? Because white privilege is a real thing. It exists at every level of infrastructure in WE society.
White people will be given as many chances as they need in order to succeed, whereas visible minorities will usually be given one, two if they're lucky. Worse, any chances that visible minorities get won’t translate into empowerment or greater opportunities.
It will only translate into a mediocre lifestyle and/or token status. And token status and a comfortable living are much better than nothing. But there's no comparison to the seismic opportunities that white people will be given.
But that's objectively speaking. Subjectively speaking, low-mid income white people feel that they're second class citizens to visible minorities. Why? Because visible minorities are being given priority via affirmative action domestically. Internationally, visible minorities overseas are taking white people's blue collar jobs in every sector via NAFTA and trade deals in manufacturing, technology, and financial services.
Many racist and non-racist white people feel that their culture and identity are disappearing. And with the Syrian refugee crisis, it's understandable why they would think that with the advent of welfare checks to refugees. [76] [77]
These blue collar workers live simple lives and earn a living on the sweat of their brow. Taking those opportunity away from them via trade deals was a mistake. If you take opportunity X away from People A, you have to fill the void with something else. If you don't, you're going to have bitter resentment, leading to racist ideologies, and finally leading to white supremacy and potential race wars.
And this applies to racist white people who are atheist or religious. Under the larger banner of white supremacy, atheism or religion is just a different path. There are many religious white racists just as there are atheist white racists. Their ideologies of superiority is what links them. Be it god or evolution's hand, white is the best in their eyes. When atheists take out god, in theory there's room for visible minorities. But in reality, there isn't.
You need to remember that prior to the abolition of slavery, white Christians justified slavery. At the time, the Christian god loves only white believers. Apparently, non-whites at the time don't matter. And the same is true for Darwinian evolution.
The Darwinian movement is one of racism mixed with science. And this gets translated into government policy via eugenics, which is seen as objective science at the time, only later to be reinterpreted as ideological. It's a shame that many scientists in the past and present don’t use falsifiability and prediction as the main characteristics of objective science (see Philosophy of Science in Part I).
The events in Charlottesville are the straw that breaks the camel's back. The liberal trifecta is deluding themselves if they think that the worst is over because Steven Bannon is no longer in the white house. To be fair to conservatives, the liberal trifecta can be just as violent as the conservative right. [78] [79] [80]
Do you think that white racists who have suppressed their racist ideologies for 8 years or more are just going to pack it up and call it a day because one person died? Yah right. After the liberal shaming that causes these people to lose their jobs, where do you think they'll go?
Once you've taken away all forms of security and destroyed someone's life socially and economically, what do you think they’re going to do? They're going to move deeper into the white supremacy movement because they have no place left to go. If employers won't hire them, they'll turn to the loving arms of their white racist brethren. And that's a completely rational choice.
And then the free speech argument gets interesting. This is where liberals get conflicted. While they believe in free speech, they also want to defend visible minorities against hate speech because we're so vulnerable and sensitive. Who wins? While the liberal trifecta (more or less) believes that hate speech trumps free speech and shouldn't be allowed, I'm the opposite. Free speech always trumps hate speech and censorship.
Why? Because my loyalty (aside from being with my future family that doesn't yet exist), is to the growth and development of humanity. And humanity can't grow if the free speech of white supremacists is censored/suppressed. The greater the censorship, the greater the lack of growth occurring. Why? Because censorship in all forms equals suppression. And suppressing ones speech can never lead to growth.
While society doesn't expect you to take a bullet for your ideologies, if you can't handle offensive content, you're lacking in character. You'd have better luck living in a Buddhist monastery with your thin skin.
Of course, you don't have to kill your emotions. You can have your emotions and welcome free speech at the same time. If the content hurts you, reflect on the reasons why. This is another way of creating your purpose in life.
Reflect on the things that cause you pain in your life and ask yourself why and use that as a springboard in creating a purposeful life. If you don't like the pain, but don't want to deny their right to free speech, what's your solution? Every obstacle is a potential opportunity for your growth and the growth of humanity.
When white supremacists say that visible minorities should be killed, I would defend their right to say that in public, on a blog, or on a YouTube video. Why? Because it's a genuine belief. And if they kill someone or attempt to do so, they should be killed in return. There's no room for this life in prison bullsh*t and showing these people compassion by letting them reflect on their actions while serving the prison industry.
Humanity, at our current level of development, can't help these people (see The Death Penalty & Jail in Part II). The best route for everyone (even if they don't admit it) is a quick and painless death. I recommend a bullet to the head.
If liberal p*ssies can't do it, I'll pull the trigger for them and go to bed after some nice organic green tea. If you're shocked by these words, that's only because you've been conditioned to become squeamish p*ssies.
When white supremacists say that visible minorities should be segregated, I'll defend their right to say that in public, on a blog, or on a YouTube video. Again, we can't grow as a species if we censor content that we don't like. If we create the technology to take us out into the stars, we'll be taking all of our racism, sexism, and censorship with us. We have to deal with it now. And censorship is not the correct way to deal with it.
Radical dualism is my long term solution. My short term solution is quotas, affirmative action, visible minority owners/board of directors of multinational corporations, and harsh penalties for criminals. What's your solution?
Interestingly enough, the segregation argument shouldn’t be easily dismissed. During the civil rights movement, Malcolm X advocates for segregation in order to achieve black empowerment. MLK Jr. doesn't support segregation and welcomes integration in order to achieve peace and equality.
Black empowerment vs. peace and equality? The black community of the past chooses MLK's vision. Was that the correct decision? In the 21st century, we don’t really have equality. We have visible minorities at the bottom rung and white owners/board of directors at the top (21st century slavery).
We have peace overall, but only at the cost of black empowerment and the lack of empowerment of all visible minorities. Which path should have been chosen?
The empowerment of black, Hispanic, brown, and Aboriginal people doesn't exist in the 21st century on any level whatsoever in WE society. And no, the election of Obama doesn't lead to the empowerment of visible minorities. Why not? I'll let you figure that one out for yourself.
But getting back to the white supremacy movement, if they really get organized, the liberal trifecta should be careful. Everything that you do can and will be tracked by white supremacists who have nothing to lose and willing to die for the cause. While this picture may seem far off, in reality it's not. As the liberal trifecta continues to shame white racists at protests, they're also planting the seeds of their own destruction. Blades sharpening blades.
Will it lead to violence? Yes. Will it lead to death? Most certainly. But that's how change occurs in the 21st century. That's the level of development we're at. If a hot button issue like race doesn't lead to death, nothing will be resolved. It will just smolder with the next generation of extremists. Oddly enough, it's only after both sides experience massive losses, do we lose sight of our extreme positions and care more about living, regardless of ideologies.
The exception is Muslim extremism of course. When you believe in fairytales in the afterlife and a holy war, everyone on the planet is put at risk. Muslim extremism or White supremacy? Which is the greater threat? It would be nice if these two camps could finish each other off and let everyone else get on with their lives. But that would be too easy. And no one said life was going to be easy or fair.
And just in case you're wondering, all of those statues of Confederates should have been removed over a century ago. Keeping them up glorifies racism and slavery. History is history. No one's denying their actions. But you don't need to glorify racists. Keeping them up sends a signal to white supremacists that racism is secretly okay, as long as you don't call it racism.
If governments leave the statues up, they might as well create a statue of black men with chains around their neck being whipped by a white slave owner. Why? Why not? It's history. Closet racist politicians and incompetent liberals only add fuel for racists as they defend the statues or the naming of schools after racists.
And then there's the demographic argument. There are more of them than us. Our nation is filled with inferior unclean heathens. In reality, the 2016 US population of white people (not including Hispanics or Latinos) is 61.3%. [81]
But let's pretend that the ratio is 50/50 or 40/60 for white people, do white supremacists then have an argument against affirmative action or quotas? No. Why not? Because power lies at the top (owners/board of directors). And the top is usually all white.
It doesn't matter how many visible minorities are at the bottom. White CEOs and board of directors are the new slave owners, with visible minorities plowing the technological/ manufacturing/media fields in the 21st century (including liberal organizations).
White supremacists and the Jewish issue are quite fascinating for visible minorities. While we regard Jews as white, white supremacists don’t regard them as white. What else would they be? Apparently, the term Jew counts as its own classification with White, Black, Brown, Asian, and Hispanic.
How? If you keep repeating a false ideology long enough, it sticks. That's why racism and sexism last so long. They're all based on unfalsifiable ideologies, all with the backing of so-called objective science in the past. White supremacists could even argue that the science today isn't really science because it's been muddled with political correctness.
But the relationship between Jewish people and black people is complex. On the one hand, some Jews consider themselves to be a visible minority like black people and do their best to help them by giving them jobs and supporting their rights in the past. On the other hand, most black people feel that Jews are just as white as anyone else and resent their own employee status while Jewish people are the owners/mangers/board of directors.
While both walk in solidarity in the past, only Jewish people have ascended to the upper echelons of government and industry today due to their white privileged status. This is something that black people (and all visible minorities in general) will never experience.
And this doesn't include the perceptions of the Israeli/Palestinian issue. Nor does it include black Muslims vs. black Christians. Older Israelis vs. the younger Israeli generation. Nor does it include the Black Lives Matter (BLM) position on Israel.
All of these side issues complicate the situation because the main issue is about the social, economic, and financial status of Jewish people relative to real visible minorities today, including the perception of the situation by the global public. It's genuinely complicated.
For white conspiracy theorists, the Jewish issue is a quagmire. If they support Israel, they're seen as a shill serving their Jewish overlords. If they support Palestinians, they're seen as supporting Islam. They're f*cked either way.
Personally, I'm anti-religion, especially anti-Islam. So if I have to choose, I lean toward the Israeli side. And of course, if the Jews become an accepted target of vilification from 21st century white supremacists, all visible minorities will be next. Hence, the kinship between visible minorities and Jewish people.
But even though I lean toward the Israeli side, I still believe that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the German government, and the French government are enemies of free speech for their hate speech laws. The ideology that criticism of the Israeli government represents racism (even from actual visible minorities) is laughable. And I would include the US government on this list if they pass the Israel Anti-Boycott Act.
Of course, many visible minorities take the opposite position because they feel that Arabs are the visible minorities and are being persecuted in Israel. And that's the rub. The discrimination/visible minority status is relative to geography.
In China, Chinese people are not a visible minority. But in the US they are. In the Middle East (aside from Israel), Arabs are not a visible minority. But in Israel they are. Geography and political boundaries changes the power dynamics.
One of the usual claims from white supremacists, white conspiracy theorists, and white conservatives in general is that visible minorities play the race card too much. And to a degree that's true.
One of the few advantages that visible minorities have (if you can call it an advantage) is that visible minorities can play the race card when things aren't going their way. And many times they're correct. But sometimes a situation can appear to be a racist, but in reality it's not. It's just the way the optics look.
The reason why using the term advantage is questionable is because it's entirely dependent on the liberal trifecta in WE society. Liberals are the ones that will listen and put pressure on corporations or governments about racial issues. Conservatives today would turn a blind eye to racial issues without pressure from the liberal trifecta.
This is why I mention in many articles that liberals are not intelligent enough to govern. But they are suitable to be the official opposition or conduct investigative journalism. When it comes to racial and gender discrimination, liberals are the ones who will actually listen.
If liberals didn't exist in WE society, white Christians would claim that every person has their place in the eyes of the Christian god, and the role for visible minorities would definitely be inferior to white Christians. Much of society in the past, present and future is highly dependent on each other. Take out one sphere of influence/pressure/conditioning and it changes the entire game.
Black Lives Matter (BLM)
The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement is a reactionary movement against the mass killing of unarmed black men by police officers. But it's also a movement to fill the void left behind MLK Jr. Sure, there's Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, and Barak Obama.
While all of them talk a big game, none of them have considerable power (or choose not to use that power) to empower the black community. Remember, the BLM movement is created during Obama's term.
The problems in the black community are old and widespread. While Aboriginals can claim unequal treatment from white colonizers beginning in the 1600s, black people have been enslaved by white people for practically all of recorded history (minus the last 150 years).
Even after the abolition of slavery, the legal oppression of black people only ends in the 1970s. And even after that, the social, economic, and financial oppression of black people still continues in the 21st century. That's what the BLM movement is fighting against. They're fighting against the GSIG conspiracy to disempower black people all over the world. And that's not accidental. That's intentional.
The battle against white oppression/racism is an upward battle for all visible minorities, especially black people. And there's no right or wrong way to fight oppression. While many people condemn the violence that BLM seems to advocate, I don't. What? You're a horrible person.
Contrary to what you may believe, violence will forever be part of humanity's destiny. Even IF...and it's a big IF, we grow and develop as a species and as beings of consciousnes, violence will still be part of our humanity. Thinking otherwise is delusional.
The reason why I would give visible minorities a free pass into violence against white oppressors/racists is because it would be disingenuous not to do so. In the past, white people are allowed to kill and openly discriminate against visible minorities. But today, white people in all systems of power call on visible minorities to use your words. Umm...what?
That's basically saying that white violence against visible minorities in the past is acceptable, while visible minority violence against white racists is unacceptable. That's disingenuous. All of the people who claim that non-violence is the answer in solving racism, sexism, and inequality are living in their ideological bubble wrapped world.
They're not living in the reality that visible minorities live in. Why not? Because most liberal pundits/owners/boards of directors are white. They'll never understand the feelings of visible minorities because of their white privileged status.
It's very interesting that the black community chooses MLK's vision of integration vs. Malcolm X's vision of segregation. Which path leads to the empowerment of black people? The answer is definitely not MLK's integration vision. There are zero empowered black people that wield any significant level of power in MLK's vision today. Zero.
And no, Barak Obama and US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas doesn't count. Why not? Because they're not actively empowering the black community. They're just enjoying their positions of power for themselves, either financially or socially.
It reminds me of White Christian pastors that believe in the Jesus wants me to be rich doctrine. I despise such pastors. These are fake Christians. Jesus wouldn't recognize any of them as real Christians. Even the Christians of ancient or medieval times wouldn’t recognize today's Christians as genuine.
Forgive the tangents. I have a lot of anger to displace. There's a good reason why I choose to see the world through a lens of comedy. Without it...oh dear god. To be fair, I have a very loving and playful inner child. But let's get back to integration vs. segregation.
While MLK's vision of integration and peace is a failure in terms of empowering black people, I don't advocate for segregation of visible minorities. But an argument can still be made for segregation.
During the segregation era, the black community was more or less thriving relative to their own community. They had good jobs, housing, education, and social status. Again, all of this is relative of course. It was far from the best jobs, housing, education, and social status possible, but it wasn't as bad as the ghettos that exist today.
And this is an interesting issue. One of the differences between poor white and black people is malevolent destruction. Poor trailer trash white people are not malevolent or actively seeking the destruction of white culture or their white trailer trash neighbors.
But black people who live in the ghettos will actively seek the destruction of their neighbors or elsewhere in a malevolent manner via drugs, prostitution, or blackmail. That's a significant difference.
Black thugs today are actively seeking to rebrand black culture as one of violence, prostitution, and drugs. That's a huge problem. Just as liberal media outlets ignore/turn a blind eye towards Aboriginal on Aboriginal violence, they do the same for black on black crime as well. Why? That's not what we're selling. We're selling white people as the bad guy.
And no, you can't use the conditioning argument. You can't say that poor black people don't know any better. Not in the 21st century. In the digital information age, help exists in every form, and on every level for visible minorities.
If black people don't want help and choose a destructive path, like Aboriginals, that's on them. Morally speaking, personal responsibility trumps conditioning any day. Legally speaking, conditioning trumps personal responsibility in our current WE justice system.
The reason why I don't support segregation is because it's a step backwards in the growth and development of humanity. I'm interested in humanity moving forward, not backwards. Segregating into different fiefdoms may empower a small amount of people, but it will prevent humanity from moving forward.
However, black and even white separatists can argue that empowerment can only be achieved through segregation. White people and Chinese people are segregated for a very long time and achieve incredible levels of empowerment.
But Aboriginals or black people in Africa are also segregated for long periods of time in history and fail to achieve the same level of empowerment. It's an interesting and touchy observation.
But regardless, if you're against segregation today, you should have a good reason, a good WHY as to why you're against it. Being against segregation because it's the norm is not a genuine position. And to complicate things, MLK's vision of integration has failed to empower the black community as a whole, be it in WE societies or in Africa.
There are very few black people in positions of power that are empowering the black community. The only two people I can think of are Louis Farrakhan and Bill Cosby. Farrakhan's way is through the path of Islam. Sorry, but you can't empower someone through a religion of submission.
And just so we're clear, that applies to the women that support white supremacists/white racists in general. It's an act of submission, not empowerment. Generally speaking, white supremacists are threatened by a strong woman. Period. Women only have value to these men as baby making machines and raising kids.
And if anything goes wrong with that child rearing, guess who's going to bear the brunt of it? God help homosexual children in a white supremacist household. But then again, the Christian god apparently doesn't like f*ggots. Ah...the benevolent mercy and love of the Christian god. Truly remarkable.
One of the consequences of Muslim submission is that white people (and all rational people in general), are scared of it. Contrary to what the liberal trifecta wants you to believe, Muslims in general are cracked in the head.
Declaring jihad against anything and everyone, and killing civilians and children, are truly acts of scum. And Muslims that secretly endorse such actions are scum as well. They just lack the courage and conviction to get their hands dirty over their religious beliefs.
And all of this is taking place under the backdrop of liberal journalists trying to whitewash these horrible actions as having nothing to do with the peaceful religion of Islam. These liberals are definitely cracked in the head.
Oddly enough, the only credible person left in the black empowerment movement is Bill Cosby. While Cosby is still on trial for sexual assault (innocent until proven guilty), his work to empower black people to take responsibility for their lives is incontrovertible.
While some will criticize him for being a rich black man imposing his values on poor black people, Cosby is genuine and knows that empowerment equals success. It may not be financial success, but it's success nonetheless.
Cosby is not a black separatist, but he knows that integration has failed. His black liberal critics can criticize him all they want, but they'll never be the editor-in-chief, or the owner, or a board of director of the very same liberal institution they work for. And that's not accidental. That's intentional.
Why? Because there's a GSIG conspiracy to disempower visible minorities. It may sound unbelievable to you at first, but when you think it through, everything else makes sense. And once you have a decent grasp of the big picture, you can finally take genuine actions to change the situation.
Cosby's recommendations of taking responsibility for ones actions, proper parenting, and getting rid of black ghetto culture influences are excellent short term wins. But the long term wins will only become reality when visible minorities change their mindset to empower themselves via their purpose in life.
If you don't know where to begin in finding/creating your purpose in life, I recommend radical dualism (see Philosophy of Mind in Part I and Autoimmune Diseases for Everyone in Part IV).
And no, Jay-Z isn't empowering the black community. The issue of black rappers is an interesting one for the conspiracy theory movement. Some black conspiracy theorists see black rappers like Jay-Z as sellouts for being owned by Jews.
Again, most Jewish people today just want to help black people. On the one hand, Jewish people and white people in general see it as empowering black people. On the other hand, some black people and visible minorities in general see it as white men controlling visible minorities.
Aside from the fact that Jewish people today will never understand the issues that black people face due to their white privileged status, the relationship between visible minorities, especially black people and Jewish people is complicated in the 21st century.
Of course, individually speaking (without all the labels), it's just a human being trying to help another human being. It's a shame that all of our labels today are causing more pain than healing.
The reaction against BLM is interesting. The most famous reaction is the All Lives Matter movement by white racists (even if they don't see themselves as racists). Even as unarmed black people are still getting killed by police officers in 2017, the All Lives Matter movement is still going strong.
I don't need to tell you how bad it is to be born black in 2017. Aside from the overt racism by white supremacist, the indirect racism by others is worse. Knowing that a person is racist is one thing. But thinking that person isn't racist when they really are but hide it is moving into sociopath levels.
And that's where we are today. We have closet racists denying visible minorities jobs, housing, and services all because of their race/ethnicity. What's worse? Being killed directly by white people in the past because of race? Or, being killed emotionally, mentally, socially, and financially by white people today on a chronic basis, at all levels of society?
You can easily Google "police kill unarmed black man" or "discrimination against black people" and you'll get your evidence.
I don't need to show you references of the FBI actively trying to destroy the black empowerment movement in the past.
I don't need to show you references of all the unarmed black men who have died at the hands of police/in their custody.
I don't need to tell you that mass incarcerations of black people turn one-time petty criminals into lifelong thugs.
I don't need to tell you that the current WE justice system/police give chances to white people if they make a mistake but don't give any meaningful ones to black people.
I don't need to tell you any of this because you should already know it. If you don't know this, then you choose not to know about it for whatever reason. But what you may not know is that all of this is part of a broader GSIG conspiracy against visible minorities.
The evidence is already in front of you in the previous subsections. You can see the appearance of equality vs. actual equality. You can see the equality policy on paper and the opposite in reality.
You're not blind. You just choose not to make the overarching GSIG conspiracy conclusion because you don't want to be seen/see yourself as a crackpot conspiracy theorist. I understand. You don't need to tell others that you're a conspiracy theorist.
You don't need to go public with that stigmatized label. I can do that. Though you don't have to go public with the conspiracy theorist label, you need to be aware of the GSIG conspiracies if you want to make the world a better place for others.
Again, BLM is an attempt at justice and to fill the void in the black community leadership. BLM is NOT a black separatist movement. While I support BLM, sadly, it won't succeed. Why not? Because most white people don't care if black people die.
In fact, most white people would dance for joy if all black people on the planet dies or disappears tomorrow. Why? Because they're racist and don't want black people to be a drain on WE society via welfare and Medicaid (which is taxpayer funded).
And not only white people, but many non-black visible minorities are also racist to black people. And don't think that black people don't already know this. They know it. They know that a large amount of non-blacks (white and visible minorities) don't give a f*ck about them.
And that's a tough cross to bear. Can you imagine walking to the store knowing that the person walking towards you doesn't really care if you live or die? For the sake of appearances, they'll care. But you know that they don't really care.
While it's noble for BLM to want the US justice system to be just towards black people...it's a pipe dream. Generally speaking, if you're wronged in the US, you'll get your justice. But only at the cost of your reputation, health, finances, and social status.
If you're a visible minority, you'll be lucky if you get any justice at all. And even if you do, it'll be token justice. Just for the sake of appearances.
Visible Minorities Who Want to be White
And now we can finally get to the last touchy and dicey issue, visible minorities who want to be white. Sound unbelievable? See for yourself:
But her vehement denial hasn't stopped the conversation around her skin colour, mainly because she has gone from someone many Indian women could identify with, to just another pale-skinned Bollywood star.
...A 2014 Morgan Stanley report found that for nearly half of Indian consumers who took part in a survey, the most important attribute in a skin cream is its ability to lighten skin colour.
While superstars like Shar Rukh Khan and Hrithik Roshan have been endorsing fairness creams for nearly a decade now, several younger actors have started speaking out against India's obsession with fair skin. [118]
She uses skin lightening creams which are popular with many Afro-Caribbean, African and Asian people, despite repeated health warnings.
Some of the products contain toxic chemicals, such as hydroquinone, which may cause skin irritation, bleaching, or even infection, when applied in excessive quantities.
...I didn't really want to destroy my skin.
But if you ask me: 'Would you still have stopped, if it hadn't done any harm?'
Trust me, no! Why would I stop? [119]
Since his retirement from baseball in 2009, Sammy Sosa skin color lightening to a whiter shade has been keeping him relevant in the news.
...Time Magazine spoke with a dermatologist in Chicago who speculated that some of the stark differences in the lightened color occurred because Sosa was overcompensating. WebMD warns that an overcompensation of changes to Sammy Sosa skin pigmentation can result in mercury poisoning and permanent "liver" spots.
While Sosa defended the vampire look by stating that photos made him look lighter, and in person the difference would not be as noticeable, he continued to appear whiter as months went on. [120]
While we have debated whether other celebrities like Beyonce and Rihanna have actually lightened their skin or if the magazines that featured their images had photoshopped their complexions, with Kim, there surely can be little question.
It looks as though she has lightened her once black-girl-brown complexion to one that’s not so brown at all. Her hair is longer, straighter, blonder. Her once round nose now thin. Even her eyes sit differently on her face. She’s changed, in ways that words can’t even begin to capture. And it hurts.
...And all over that world, people of color use a variety of chemicals to lighten the complexion of their skin. In fact, wherever there are people of color—Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, and the United States—there is skin bleaching.
In places where the majority of the population has browner or darker skin, wearing relatively lighter skin provides social advantage; and for women particularly, the social advantage that comes with having lighter skin is being seen, and thus treated, as more beautiful and attractive. [121]
Bleaching, whitening, lightening. Whatever you call it, the business of cosmetic enhancement to make dark skin look paler continues. Creams, pills and surgical treatments are used across continents by darker-skinned ethnicities hoping for a whiter complexion. But the problem, like most of those thrown up by the cosmetic industry, is often seen as largely as the concern of women.
...I was shocked to learn that the dancehall artist Vybz Kartel – never one to shy away from a commercial venture – is launching a range of cosmetics this month, including his own brand of skin lightener. It's something of an (un)natural progression from the musician's decision earlier this year to lighten his own skin and the launch of his own "cake soap", a traditional Jamaican product intended for white clothes but which is reportedly misused to alter skin colour. [122]
For some visible minorities, they believe that by lightening their skin they'll have a better chance at succeeding in a white man's world. And they would be correct. Hollywood actors/actresses, and music celebrities are under enormous pressure to lighten their skin.
Obviously, Hollywood producers don't say it outright, but the message is clear. If you want more lead roles, you're going to have to lighten your skin. You know, something we can market, sell, and make a profit on.
In theory, all visible minorities face discrimination. In reality, light skinned visible minorities that can pass for WE white people (like Dwayne Johnson/The Rock), don't experience racial discrimination.
Their genotype is one of a visible minority, but their phenotype can pass for a white person. The racial discrimination that light skinned black people experience is very different from the racial discrimination that dark skinned black people experience:
Juanita [Judy Juanita, former Black Panther]: Colorism—meaning one's color affected one's destiny within the black community, and people of lighter complexion received preferential treatment...
I would say I don't think it was a mistake that Kathleen, Elaine, Ericka Huggins—and even Angela Davis, if you want to go that far—were all fairer-skinned. They were beautiful in a more acceptable way. And when I say acceptable, I don't even mean acceptable just to a white mainstream society, but maybe, at that point, more acceptable to blacks also. [123]
The racial discrimination that brown people experience is very different from the racial discrimination that Asians experience. The racial discrimination that Aboriginals experience is very different from the racial discrimination that Metis experience (if they experience it at all).
But let me explain that last one. Oh dear god. I hope I still have Aboriginal friends after this article goes online...but I doubt it. But that's what happens when you strive to be genuine in your words and actions.
The term Metis is a term that means mixed ancestry, white and Aboriginal. Until a few years ago, Aboriginal women in Canada lost their official Aboriginal status if they married a white man. By doing so, they gained the status of Metis.
Today, Aboriginal women no longer lose their official Aboriginal status when marrying non-Aboriginals. Hence, the term Metis is a dead term. In one sense, there's no more Metis because the laws change.
But in another sense, there will always be more Metis being born because Metis people will continue to have Metis children. In 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada recognized Metis as a legitimate "Indian" along with Aboriginal, Inuit, and non-status Indians. [124]
In theory, there's no bad blood between Aboriginal (full Aboriginal ancestry) and Metis (mixed). In reality, there is. Allow me to explain why. If a white man and Aboriginal woman have a child, the child will undoubtedly look Aboriginal. So that's the first generation.
If the first generation child has a child with another non-Aboriginal partner, they'll more or less still look Aboriginal. That's the second generation. But if the second generation child has a child with another non-Aboriginal partner, that's when it gets fuzzy.
While the genotype definitely has Aboriginal elements, the phenotype may not express those and cause the child to look completely non-Aboriginal. This is the third generation child.
And let's pretend that this third generation child, now an adult, definitely doesn't look Aboriginal but has Aboriginal genetics regardless. They fill out a job application and checkmark the visible minority box. Is that a problem? Yes. To who? To Aboriginals who look Aboriginal. And it's a dicey argument.
On the one hand, in this example, there's no doubt about Aboriginal ancestry. You could even use a fourth generation child instead of the third if you want, but the results would be the same. The third generation child definitely has Aboriginal ancestry (that's not in question). But the child doesn't look Aboriginal.
In this example, the public/average person perceives the third generation adult to be non-Aboriginal. If the adult continues to advocate for their visible minority status, full Aboriginals would start to resent them. And the resentment is understandable.
The third generation adult doesn't face any racial discrimination because of their non-Aboriginal appearance, while full Aboriginals do face the discrimination on a regular basis. And that's a problem.
Both are genuinely Aboriginal and advocate for their Aboriginal heritage, but only one faces racial discrimination. Which one is in the right? Like I said, it's a touchy issue. Both sides have genuine arguments, but only one is looked at favorably in the eyes of the public. Should we be checking visible minority boxes based on genotype or phenotype? Ancestry vs. the perception of appearance.
There are many light skinned/white visible minorities. Mexicans/Latinos have very light skin. Asians (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and such) have skin whiter than WE white people. Even with that light skin, there are very few famous Asian actors/actresses/celebrities in Hollywood. That's not accidental. That's intentional.
What's missing? The perception of being white. Having white skin but having the appearance of an Asian person isn't good enough to succeed in a white man's world. Having light skin and looking Mexican doesn’t change a person's view about Mexican culture. You can't just have white skin. You have to look like a WE white person to get ahead in this world.
Of course, this can only be done by people with money. Michael Jackson is the perfect example. Jackson is born with the genotype and phenotype of a black man. Jackson dies with the genotype of a black man but with the phenotype of a white man. Allow me to be clear. Jackson is definitely ashamed of being black. Don't believe me? listen to his longtime friend and music producer Quincy Jones:
It's ridiculous, man! Chemical peels and all of it. And I don't understand it. But he [Jackson] obviously didn't want to be black. [125]
All of Jackson's children (regardless of what they say) are most likely not his biological children. [126] [127] [128] A child of a black man and white woman will have features (phenotype) that looks black. None of his children have features that show his black ancestry.
Of course, there are many good reasons for using sperm donors and surrogates. But one reason that can hide behind the more rational reason is that Jackson doesn't want to be the father of child who looks black.
I don't have any direct evidence for this claim so it's just a conspiracy theory. But if you want to add more fuel to the fire, you can say that the white music producers that manage Jackson advise him to use a surrogate. See how easy it is to create a conspiracy theory?
Again, there's no direct evidence for this, but it's not impossible considering what Jackson does to look white. I don't mean his vitiligo condition. I mean the work he has done to his hair, nose, and facial structure:
He started out modestly enough — by just wanting a different nose. In the end, after up to 100 procedures, he was desperately trying to repair the damage done by reckless and botched operations and injections.
Michael Jackson, surely the most infamous example of the perils of cosmetic surgery, spent 30 years trying to achieve his idea of perfection.
...After Erhardt's new chin was revealed, Jackson went on to have this operation several times.
Despite his initial nerves, Michael also had Botox, fillers, bleached his skin, had cheek implants and lip augmentation. He changed the shape of his nose to the point that it was so narrow the airways were blocked. [129]
None of that facial surgery is necessary due to the burn accident in 1984. But he does it nonetheless. For Jackson, the natural ethnic black look isn't perfect enough for him. And if it's not good enough for him, why should it be good enough for young black youth?
Don't misunderstand though. I believe that Michael Jackson is the single greatest performer on the planet. But he was cracked in the head in his quest for perfection and beauty. Let me give you one final example of visible minorities who want to be white. Asians.
While Asians have white skin even whiter than most WE white people, they don't exactly look white. What's their solution? Marry into a white family so their kids look WE white:
There is really so much more to be said about why "white privilege" is actually quite advantageous and should be respected. As an ethnic minority individual, I'll never really know what it is like to be white, so I can only posit my own conjectures based on my personal experiences and observations of white people. I suppose any of my criticisms would be invalid anyway, as they likely stem from deep-seated jealousy of the white race and an inner longing to be white. I can only hope that my future generations can embrace and perpetuate this "white privilege" by marrying into the race until all traces of my Chinese descent have been dissolved.[7]
If that doesn't work, you can always give allegiance to white supremacists and neo-Nazis:
...the Donald Trump-loving Tequila has gone on to become a conspiracy theory-embracing Nazi, unapologetically calling herself an "alt-reich queen!" on her Twitter bio and appearing at the white nationalist National Policy Institute conference this past weekend.
...Along with penning her massively misguided manifesto "Why I Sympathize With Hitler: Part 1," the reality TV star shocked fans by posting a photo of herself holding a gun and wearing a Nazi armband while posing in front of Auschwitz in 2013. [130]
If that doesn't work, you can admire white people for their beauty and pretend that you're white on the inside:
When Wang Ge, a business school student, wakes up, she often asks herself, "What would Ivanka do?"
That would be Ivanka Trump, the eldest daughter of President Trump, a woman Ms. Wang has never met but worships.
...But in China, Ms. Trump is widely adored.
...She is called a "goddess" on social media. A video of her daughter singing in Chinese went viral, attracting tens of millions of viewers. Working mothers have latched onto Ms. Trump's brand of have-it-all feminism. [131]
And then we get to Japanese people who want to be white. Oh dear god. I don't think I'll ever have any Japanese friends after this article goes online. And that's tough considering the fact that I love Japanese anime. But if I strive to be genuine in my actions and words, I have to say it.
If you look at Japanese anime, you'll find that all of the main characters look like WE white people instead of Asian white:
Uzumaki Naruto – Naruto series
Uchiha Sasuke – Naruto series
Uchiha Madara – Naruto series
Hatake Kakashi – Naruto series
Uchiha Itachi – Naruto series
Jiraiya – Naruto series
Tsunade - Naruto series
Orochimaru - Naruto series
Kurosaki Ichigo - Bleach
Kuchiki Rukia - Bleach
Urahara Kisuke - Bleach
Zaraki Kenpachi - Bleach
Hitsugaya Toshiro - Bleach
Sosuke Aizen – Bleach
Kuchiki Byakuya – Bleach
Abarai Renji – Bleach
Monkey D. Luffy – One Piece
Roronoa Zoro – One Piece
Gon Freecss - Hunter × Hunter
Killua Zoldyck - Hunter × Hunter
Kurapika - Hunter × Hunter
Re-l Mayer – Ergo Proxy
Vincent Law – Ergo Proxy
Major Mira Killian – Ghost in the Shell
Batou – Ghost in the Shell
Eren Yeager - Attack on Titan/Shingeki no Kyojin
Mikasa Ackerman - Attack on Titan
Armin Arlert - Attack on Titan
Jean Kirschtein - Attack on Titan
Levi - Attack on Titan
Edward Elric - Full Metal Alchemist
Yugi Mutou - Yu-Gi-Oh!
Seto Kaiba - Yu-Gi-Oh!
Goku – Dragonball series
Vegeta - Dragonball series
Gohan - Dragonball series
Yagami Light – Death Note
L – Death Note
Amane Misa – Death Note
Not a single main character looks Asian/Japanese. Not one. And that's not accidental. That's intentional. Why? Because Japanese animators/people in general like to see themselves as WE white people. What they can't achieve in reality, they create in fiction.
This is why the whitewashing of live-action anime (Ghost in the Shell and Death Note) has no argument. It's not that Hollywood only wants to cast white actors/actresses in these live actions (though they do). It's that the character themselves already look like WE white people. It only makes sense for WE white actors/actresses to play the roles.
But then again, maybe all of this is a big misunderstanding. Perhaps Asians don't really want to be like WE white people. Rather, they see themselves as the original and true white people, while WE white people are merely imitations of them.
In this theory, the Asian white (instead of WE white) represents the highest rung on the evolutionary ladder. Asian white, not WE white is supposed to be the dominant ruler of the planet with people imitating them, not the other way around. An interesting theory.
Continued in Part 4.
References:
[1] To Seek Political Power: A Fool's Errand. YouTube video. Posted by: The Alex Jones Channel, May 10, 2017.
[2] Stack, Liam. In Stanford Rape Case, Brock Turner Blamed Drinking and Promiscuity. New York Times. June 8, 2016.
[3] Miller, Michael, E. 'A steep price to pay for 20 minutes of action': Dad defends Stanford sex offender. Washington Post. June 6, 2016.
[4] La Ganga, Maria L. Idaho judge rules attack on high school football player was 'not a rape' or racist. Guardian. February 25, 2017.
[5] Davies, Caroline. Student who stabbed boyfriend may avoid jail as it would 'damage her career.' Guardian. May 16, 2017.
[6] Fortgang, Tal. Why I'll Never Apologize for My White Male Privilege. Princeton Tory. May 2, 2014.
[7] Ling, Christina. In Defense of White Privilege. HuffPost. November 1, 2016.
[8] White Billionaire Explains Why White Privilege Is A Myth. YouTube video. Posted by: The Alex Jones Channel, March 9, 2016.
[9] Schlichter, Kurt. I Checked My Privilege, And It's Doing Just Fine. Townhall. May 12, 2014.
[10] I Love My White Male Privilege! YouTube video. Posted by: Paul Joseph Watson, March 2, 2016.
[11] DEAR BLACK PEOPLE (BuzzFeed is Cancer). YouTube video. Posted by: The Alex Jones Channel, May 8, 2017.
[12] Ludwig, Sarah. Credit scores in America perpetuate racial injustice. Here's how. Guardian. October 13, 2015.
[13] Bill Maher on White Privilege. YouTube video. Posted by: BCflyzz, March 4, 2016.
[14] Graham, David A. Americans Oppose Affirmative Action for Race, If You Only Ask White Americans. Atlantic. May 31, 2013.
[15] Ryan, Erin Gloria. White People Hate Affirmative Action Unless They Benefit From It. Jezebel. August 13, 2013.
[16] Doucette, Chris. White worker says Canada Revenue Agency discriminated against him. Toronto Sun. October 28, 2015.
[17] Savage, Charlie. Justice Dept. to Take On Affirmative Action in College Admissions. New York Times. August 1, 2017.
[18] Monsebraaten, Laurie, et al. Ministry-funded CAS report urges overhaul to keep black kids out of care. Toronto Star. September 29, 2016.
[19] Valby, Karen. The Realities of Raising a Kid of a Different Race. Time. Unknown date.
[20] Yanklowitz, Shmuly. I'm a white foster parent seeing racism through my black and brown children's eyes. Washington Post. July 12, 2017.
[21] Dokoupil, Tony. What Adopting a White Girl Taught One Black Family. Newsweek. April 22, 2009.
[22] Pells, Rachael. Black and ethnic minority teachers face 'invisible glass ceiling' in schools, report warns. Independent. April 14, 2017.
[23] Brown, Louise. Black teachers still face racism on the job in Ontario. Toronto Star. May 29, 2015.
[24] Dunn, Trevor. In wake of racism scandal, York school board says 'sorry.' CBC News. May 18, 2017.
[25] Anderson, Melinda D. How the Stress of Racism Affects Learning. Atlantic. October 11, 2016.
[26] Klein, Rebecca. More Parents Of Color Think Racism Is Holding Back Their Children In School. HuffPost. May 3, 2017.
[27] Anderson, Melinda D. How Does Race Affect a Student's Math Education? Atlantic. April 25, 2017.
[28] Chao, Julie. Asian American vets can't forget Vietnam War racism. SF Gate. April 2, 1999.
[29] Moon, Krystyn R. "There's no Yellow in the Red, White, and Blue": The Creation of Anti-Japanese Music during World War II. Pacific Historical Review. p. 334, 337-338, 340-341.
[30] Rosenstone, Robert A. Review: Racist War for Civilization. Reviews in American History, Vol. 15, No. 3, September 1987. p. 470.
[31] Greenwald, Glenn. The racism that fuels the 'war on terror.' Guardian. March 25, 2013.
[32] Vance, Kevin. Sec. Clinton Stands By Her Praise of Eugenicist Margaret Sanger. Weekly Standard. April 15, 2009.
[33] Dutton, Zoe. Abortion's Racial Gap. Atlantic. September 22, 2014.
[34] Ethics left behind as drug trials soar in developing countries. Guardian. July 4, 2011.
[35] Kelly, Stephanie. Testing Drugs on the Developing World. Atlantic. February 27, 2013.
[36] Tello, Monique. Racism and discrimination in health care: Providers and patients. Harvard Health Publications. January 16, 2017.
[37] Holland, Jesse J. Interracial couples still face hostility 50 years after landmark Loving legal case. Associated Press. June 11, 2017.
[38] Goff, Keli. The Ongoing Stigma of Interracial Dating. Daily Beast. September 15, 2014.
[39] Birkbeck, Tanya. Kahnawake mixed couple subject of 'marry out, stay out' protest. CBC News. May 2, 2015.
[40] Dumbfoundead - SAFE. YouTube video. Posted by: DUMBFOUNDEAD, May 26, 2016.
[41] Nyren, Erin. 'Whitewashing' Accusations Fly as Zach McGowan Cast as Hawaiian WWII Hero. Variety. May 9, 2017.
[42] Horn, John and Smith, Doug. Diversity efforts slow to change the face of Oscar voters. Los Angeles Times. December 21, 2013.
[43] Diversity in Movies Largely Unchanged Despite Increased Awareness, Study Finds. Associated Press. July 31, 2017.
[44] Friend, David. Female-led 'Doctor Who' stokes conversation about lack of visible minority heroines. Canadian Press. July 18, 2017.
[45] Robinson, Joanna. Is a Disappointing Ghost in the Shell the Nail in the Coffin of Hollywood Whitewashing? Vanity Fair. April 2, 2017.
[46] James, Meg and Ng, David. In Hollywood, Asian American actors see few lead roles, and pay discrepancies when they land one. Los Angeles Times. July 8, 2017.
[47] Haar, Kara. Industry Execs Discuss Hollywood's Diversity Gap at Entertainment Finance Forum. Hollywood Reporter. March 3, 2017.
[48] Horn, John, et al. Unmasking Oscar: Academy voters are overwhelmingly white and male. Los Angeles Times. February 19, 2012.
[49] Ryan, Maureen. Peak Inequality: Investigating the Lack of Diversity Among TV Directors. Variety. November 10, 2015.
[50] Garza, Frida. The little we know about the 6,000 Academy members who vote on the Oscars tells us a lot. Quartz. January 20, 2016.
[51] Easter, Makeda. 'We just want Hollywood to hear us': Film students on the future of their craft. Los Angeles Times. March 3, 2017.
[52] Klowden, Kevin and Jackson, Jessica. Women and Minorities are Hired Less, Paid Less in L.A.'s Creative Sector (Guest Column). Hollywood Reporter. March 3, 2017.
[53] Shia LaBeouf Apologizes for Racist Tirade, Says He's Struggling With Addiction. Associated Press. July 13, 2017.
[54] Fernandez, Sofia M. George Lucas: Hollywood Won't Finance an 'Expensive Movie' With an All-Black Cast (Video). Hollywood Reporter. January 11, 2012.
[55] HBO defends 'Confederate' following Charlottesville deaths. Fox News. August 15, 2017.
[56] Chris Rock: Kill the Messenger. HBO. 2008.
[57] Russell Peters on "Larry King Now". YouTube video. Posted by: Larry King, August 7, 2014.
[58] Scocca, Tom. Who Wants to Remember Bill Cosby's Multiple Sex-Assault Accusations? Gawker. February 4, 2014.
[59] Krieg, Gregory. Here's the deal with Elizabeth Warren's Native American heritage. CNN. June 29, 2016.
[60] Jerry Seinfeld Caught By The Sensitivity Police. YouTube video. Posted by: The Young Turks, February 4, 2014.
[61] Facebook Has An Unbelievable Lack Of Diversity. YouTube video. Posted by: The Young Turks, June 26, 2015.
[62] Ember, Sydney. 11 Sue Fox News, Citing 'Intolerable' Racial Bias. New York Times. April 25, 2017.
[63] Levin, Sam. Palantir to pay $1.7m over accusation it discriminates against Asian applicants. Guardian. April 26, 2017.
[64] Guynn, Jessica. Oracle sued by Labor Department for paying white men more. USA Today. January 18, 2017.
[65] Schilken, Chuck. ESPN apologizes for fantasy football segment that auctioned off players, including African Americans. Los Angeles Times. August 16, 2017.
[66] Uffalussy, Jennifer Gerson. Walmart Removes Racist Term Used in Third-Party Product Description. Yahoo Beauty. July 17, 2017.
[67] Tsang, Amie. Nivea Pulls 'White Is Purity' Ad After Online Uproar. New York Times. April 4, 2017.
[68] Victor, Daniel. Pepsi Pulls Ad Accused of Trivializing Black Lives Matter. New York Times. April 5, 2017.
[69] SNL - Pepsi Commercial_Skit. YouTube video. Posted by: Clevver News, April 10, 2017.
[70] Smith, Jack. Founder Matt Joseph Reveals the Racial Biases People of Color Face in Silicon Valley. Mic. March 22, 2016.
[71] Buranyi, Stephen. Rise of the racist robots – how AI is learning all our worst impulses. Guardian. August 8, 2017.
[72] O'Brien, Sara Ashley. Silicon Valley engineer: 'We're in a really precarious moment with race relations.' CNN. March 3, 2016.
[73] Guynn, Jessica. Google Photos labeled black people 'gorillas.' USA Today. July 1, 2015.
[74] Braga, Matthew. Canadian tech companies say they value diversity — but what are they doing about it? CBC News. July 11, 2017.
[75] Organizer apologizes after ad for Montreal's 375th features only white people. CBC News. November 22, 2016.
[76] Abedi, Maham. Refugees In Canada Rely On Welfare, Odd Jobs To Repay Debt To Federal Gov't. HuffPost. March 2, 2017.
[77] About 4,000 asylum seekers to receive welfare cheques: 'Quebec has responsibilities.' Canadian Press. August 24, 2017.
[78] Hersh, Joshua. Extremism experts are starting to worry about the left. Vice News. June 15, 2017.
[79] Fuller, Thomas, et al. 'Antifa' Grows as Left-Wing Faction Set to, Literally, Fight the Far Right. New York Times. August 17, 2017.
[80] McCreesh, Shawn. Antifa and the 'Alt-Left': Everything You Need to Know. Rolling Stone. August 19, 2017.
[81] Quick Facts. US Census Bureau. 2016.
[82] Stanley, George F.G. The Indian Background of Canadian History. Report of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Historical Association, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1952. p. 14-16, 18, 21.
[83] Aboriginal nutritional experiments had Ottawa's approval. CBC News. July 30, 2013.
[84] Gallant, Jacques. Discipline case shows 'law society has a lot to learn' about indigenous issues. Toronto Star. April 26, 2017.
[85] Mas, Susana. Bob Paulson says he doesn't want racists inside RCMP ranks. CBC News. December 9, 2015.
[86] Hutchinson, Brian. Aboriginal students face 'racism of low expectations' in B.C. schools. National Post. November 25, 2015.
[87] Popplewell, Brett. An Indian Industry has emerged amid the wreckage of many Canadian reserves. Toronto Star. October 30, 2010.
[88] Taylor, Stephanie. Canadian Tire worker who threw out Indigenous man accused of theft no longer an employee. CBC News. July 29, 2017.
[89] 'Angst' over police in Thunder Bay, Ont., 'diminishes' Canada: Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale. CBC News. June 13, 2017.
[90] City workers accidentally destroyed artwork dedicated to missing and murdered Indigenous women. CBC News. August 11, 2017.
[91] Banerjee, Sidhartha. Montreal amusement park pulls carousel horse showing Indigenous man’s severed head. Canadian Press. August 18, 2017.
[92] No charges in Halifax 'Proud Boys' incident as servicemen return to duties: navy. Canadian Press. August 31, 2017.
[93] Beeby, Dean. Counsellor overbills $360K for care of First Nations patients in Ontario. CBC News. November 25, 2016.
[94] Talaga, Tanya. Fourth Indigenous girl dies while in child protection. Toronto Star. May 9, 2017.
[95] Tasker, John Paul. Governor General apologizes for saying Indigenous people were immigrants. CBC News. June 19, 2017.
[96] Ottawa officer demoted for racist comments about Annie Pootoogook. CBC News. December 7, 2016.
[97] Winkler, Marc. New homes sit empty in Wrigley, N.W.T., despite desperate need for housing. CBC News. June 6, 2017.
[98] Mandeville, Curtis. Eviction leaves Behchoko family of 7 scrambling. CBC News. November 16, 2016.
[99] Bambury, Brent. Thunder Bay's Indigenous community says hate crimes are common and racism in the police force isn't helping. CBC Radio. March 31, 2017.
[100] Racism in Winnipeg: How do police treat Indigenous and black men? Panel weighs in. CBC News. July 12, 2016.
[101] McCue, Duncan. Racism against aboriginal people in health-care system 'pervasive': study. CBC News. February 3, 2015.
[102] Troian, Martha. Neurological and birth defects haunt Wabaseemoong First Nation, decades after mercury dumping. CBC News. September 20, 2016.
[103] Institutional racism in Winnipeg will take longer than 1 year to fix, professor says. CBC News. January 18, 2016.
[104] O’Neil, Peter. Trudeau says First Nations 'don't have a veto' over energy projects. Postmedia News. December 20, 2016.
[105] Landry, Andrea. Coerced sterilizations are more than an attack on mothers; they're an attack on Indigenous nationhood. CBC News. August 2, 2017.
[106] 'Good intent and with good spirits': after 45-minute travel delays, protest on eastbound Trans-Canada ends. CBC News. June 30, 2017.
[107] Stick, Charmaine. I starved myself for financial transparency at Onion Lake Cree Nation. CBC News. December 14, 2016.
[108] Bourbeau, Jacques. Attawapiskat First Nation must repay $1.8 million, government says. Global News. November 28, 2014.
[109] De Souza, Mike. Disclosure of First Nations salaries raises eyebrows. Toronto Star. July 29, 2014.
[110] Larkins, David. More chiefs' salaries posted to federal website. Winnipeg Sun. November 5, 2014.
[111] Transparency Act: Resource company payments to First Nations unveiled. CBC News. December 14, 2014.
[112] Harris, Kathleen. Carolyn Bennett reinstates funds frozen under First Nations Financial Transparency Act. CBC News. December 18, 2015.
[113] Beeby, Dean. Memo raises doubts about who was 'architect' of residential schools. CBC News. August 13, 2017.
[114] Ballingall, Alex. Sir John A. Macdonald: Architect of genocide or Canada’s founding father? Toronto Star. August 24, 2017.
[115] No plans to remove John A. Macdonald's name from federal properties, Trudeau says. CBC News. August 28, 2017.
[116] Tunney, Catharine. 'Everyone has warts': Indigenous MP supports John A. Macdonald's name on schools. CBC News. August 26, 2017.
[117] The Truth About Satanism and Trump. YouTube video. Posted by: The Alex Jones Channel, February 25, 2017.
[118] Kajol is no longer the "dusky" Bollywood rebel—and that's a serious problem. Quartz India. December 23, 2015.
[119] 'Bleaching destroyed my skin.' BBC News. June 12, 2009.
[120] Cheskis, Danny. The History of Sammy Sosa Skin Lightening. Sport Mockery. November 8, 2014.
[121] Blay, Yaba. Lil' Kim's Lighter, Whiter Skin Is a Sad Indictment of Racism. Daily Beast. April 25, 2016.
[122] Bakare, Lanre. Is skin bleaching in danger of becoming a trend among men? Guardian. September 7, 2011.
[123] Hix, Lisa. Black Panther Women: The Unsung Activists Who Fed and Fought for Their Community. Collectors Weekly. December 2, 2016.
[124] Smith, Joanna. Supreme Court recognizes rights of Métis and non-status Indians. Toronto Star. April 14, 2016.
[125] Hall, Katy. Quincy Jones: Jackson 'Obviously Didn't Want To Be Black.' HuffPost. August 1, 2009.
[126] Kelly, Tom. I'm the father of Michael Jackson's children and I'll take a DNA test to prove it: British actor who says his girl looks just like Paris. Daily Mail. May 5, 2013.
[127] Stark, George. Michael Jackson 'confessed Mark Lester was the father of Paris and Prince' four months before he died, claims friend. Daily Mail. June 25, 2013.
[128] Fryer, Jane. 'I tried to get through to Paris but her mother told me to eff off': Why the Oliver! child star who claims he's the biological father of Michael Jackson's daughter is banned from seeing her. Daily Mail. May 19, 2017.
[129] Revealed: Scalpel by scalpel, how Michael Jackson destroyed his looks in 100 operations...and how he'd have looked without surgery. Daily Mail. February 6, 2015.
[130] Lisi, Brian. Five moments in Tila Tequila's journey from forgettable MySpace star to full-blown, science-denying Nazi. New York Daily News. November 22, 2016.
[131] Hernandez, Javier C. The 'Goddess' Yi Wan Ka: Ivanka Trump Is a Hit in China. New York Times. April 5, 2017.
[132] Net ODA, constant 2015 USD millions. OECD.
[133] Neate, Rupert. Bill Gates gives $4.6bn to charity in biggest donation since 2000. Guardian. August 15, 2017.