Conspiracy Theories 101 Series
Part 9 of 12:
The Conspiracy Against Women
Part 1
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 1 of 12: Introduction
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 2 of 12: The Deep State
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 3 of 12: Conspiracy Theorists - Part 1 and Part 2
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 4 of 12: Pedophile Rings
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 5 of 12: The Surveillance State
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 6 of 12: The Banking State
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 7 of 12: The Environmental Movement
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 8 of 12: Breaking Up the Family Unit
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 9 of 12: The Conspiracy Against Women - Part 1 and Part 2
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 10 of 12: The Conspiracy Against Visible Minorities - Part 1 and Part 2 and Part 3 and Part 4
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 11 of 12: The Media - Part 1 and Part 2
Conspiracy Theories 101 Series Part 12 of 12: The Stigma of Being a Conspiracy Theorist - Part 1 and Part 2
By: Shawn Alli
Posted: October 10, 2017
Updated: July 2, 2022
*This article was updated in July 2022 because the original web pages were too large to be indexed by Google.
Religion
Feminism
Atheism & Science
The Justice/Legal System
Religion
Let's get right into it. GSIGs are greatly threatened by female empowerment. Why? It's not just because GISGs are mainly a male only club. It's because real female empowerment can lead to the end of GSIGs themselves.
And no, Hilary Clinton and Madeline Albright are not a threat to GSIGs. They're well conditioned by the GSIG conditioning infrastructure. And no, GSIGs aren't threatened by feminists because feminism doesn't actually empower women (as you'll eventually see).
Suppressing female empowerment is a necessary goal in order for GSIGs to continue ruling humanity behind the scenes. And one of the best ways to suppress female empowerment is with religion.
All major GSIG religions have a script to suppress female empowerment. It doesn't matter whether it’s Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, or Buddhism...the one thing they all have in common is the suppression of female empowerment.
In almost all religious mythological stories, women are demonized just for being a woman. That's not accidental. That's intentional. And this has been occurring for at least 5000 years of recorded history. Google the term "sexism" and any major religion, and you'll see. I'll start you off:
On Thursday, eight Iraqi men were sent to prison for up to 13 years for the gang rape of a German woman on New Year's Eve more than a year ago. [1]
An asylum seeker has been detained after he allegedly launched a string of sex attacks on 18 women during a single two-hour train journey.
The 23-year-old migrant is suspected of groping the women on a suburban S-Bahn German train line between Munich and Herrsching on January 29.
The Eritrean-born attacker is said to have gone from one carriage to the next touching female passengers. [2]
In this derelict two-story house, 75 Syrian women were forced into sexual slavery, the largest human trafficking network ever uncovered in Lebanon.
Here, the women were imprisoned after arriving from their war-torn country, sold for less than $2,000, and forced to have sex more than 10 times a day. Here they were beaten and tortured and electrocuted, and sometimes flogged if they didn't get enough tips.
...The women left the house to get abortions, of which they had about 200. They also left to be treated for venereal diseases, contracted after being forced to have unprotected sex with customers, or to be treated for skin ailments, brought on by their lack of exposure to the sun. [3]
...According to an obscure ruling in Islamic law cited by the Islamic State, a man must ensure that the woman he enslaves is free of child before having intercourse with her.
Islamic State leaders have made sexual slavery as they believe it was practiced during the Prophet Muhammad’s time integral to the group's operations, preying on the women and girls the group captured from the Yazidi religious minority almost two years ago. To keep the sex trade running, the fighters have aggressively pushed birth control on their victims so they can continue the abuse unabated while the women are passed among them. [4]
French women who have been effectively banned from cafés and bars in certain 'no-go' suburbs in the country are fighting back.
Journalists and activists for TV channel France 2 went undercover in various communities with high Islamic populations in Paris to show how conservative Muslim men are enforcing social segregation in public spaces. [5]
The prosecution team accused suspect Hussein K. of having "attacked, strangled and raped" Maria L., a 19-year-old medical student who was on her way home from a party on October 16, 2016. He then left the victim in the Dreisam River where she drowned, they alleged. Her body was found in the river and her bicycle discovered nearby.
...The prosecution's charge described K. as having killed Maria "insidiously and for sexual satisfaction."
K.'s arrest in December 2016 made national headlines when it was revealed that he had been on parole in Greece, where he had been detained on charges of murdering a woman on the isle of Corfu in 2013.
The Afghan national arrived in Germany in 2015 as an unaccompanied asylum-seeker and had been living with a German foster family. [6]
A 'celebrity' Saudi preacher accused of raping, torturing and killing his five-year-old daughter has reportedly been released from custody after agreeing to pay 'blood money'.
Fayhan al-Ghamdi had been accused of killing his daughter Lama, who suffered multiple injuries including a crushed skull, broken back, broken ribs, a broken left arm and extensive bruising and burns. Social workers say she had also been repeatedly raped and burnt.
Fayhan al-Ghamdi admitted using a cane and cables to inflict the injuries after doubting his five- year-old daughter’s virginity and taking her to a doctor... [7]
Swedish Green Party politician who ignited a storm of controversy after refusing to shake hands with a female reporter on grounds that it violated his Muslim faith, announced on Wednesday that he was quitting politics.
Yasri Khan is the second Muslim Green Party politician to resign in acrimony this week. [8]
The imam of a Port Coquitlam mosque convicted of sexual assault has been sentenced to three years and six months in jail.
Saadeldin Bahr, who also uses the name Dr. Saad, was the spiritual director at the Masjid Al-Hidayah and Islamic Cultural Centre.
In September 2013, Bahr was charged with one count of sexual assault against a female attendee at the mosque. [9]
A doctor in a Detroit suburb performed genital mutilation on as many as 100 girls over 12 years...
Detroit-based doctors Jumana Nagarwala and Fakhruddin Attar, as well as Attar's wife Farida, have been charged with carrying out female genital mutilation, FGM, on young girls from Minnesota...
...The Attars and Nagarwala belong to a Muslim sect called Dawoodi Bohra. They deny the charges and say a religious ritual was performed.
To date, the government has identified eight victims who were mutilated at the clinic, including the two girls from Minnesota.
...The girls had been brought into the clinic by their mothers but the parents have not been charged. [10]
I don't know how clear I can be. Generally speaking, Muslims hate and fear women. Period. You don't need academia or intellectual analysis to understand the sexism in Islam. You don't need to listen to liberal media outlets that try to dissociate the hatred of women from Islam. It's a package deal. You can't separate it.
Some Muslims practice that hatred while others don't. But either way, it's already a done deal in Islamic code/principles/scriptures. That's not up to debate. There is no debate about women's rights in Muslim countries under Sharia Law. And just to note, I left out Muslim pedophilia because it's already in another article (see Pedophile Rings).
During the World Hijab Day, American women wear American hijabs to stand with Muslim women in solidarity. [11] Good intentions but liberal delusions. Some German women even shout out Allah Akbar in solidarity. [12]
These women are enslaving themselves and their daughters. It's powerfully disturbing to watch the Muslimization of Europe, especially Germany. Why are GSIGs pushing for the Muslimization of Europe? Various reasons. Muslims reproduce at levels near Aboriginals in Canada. Women are just baby making machines and caregivers for Muslim men.
Why do GSIGs want a lot of Muslims in Europe? Because Islam is a religion of submission. Submission to authority is a strong agenda that GSIGs have been pushing for thousands of years. And if GSIG overlords are really extraterrestrials reptilians, they'll easily submit to them.
But these extraterrestrials may have to wear a human skin like in the 2009 TV show V: the Visitors. Though the writing and cinematography is pretty bad, if you want to understand potential false flags from extraterrestrials, I suggest that you look into V: the Visitors.
But let's get back to the Women March Against Trump. American women, liberals, and feminists in general believe that they can liberalize Islam. Sorry, but that's not happening. Nor will it ever happen.
For the most part, Islam will stay on the planet in its current sexist form. The only way it will end is when the last Muslim believer dies or converts to Christianity (a similar framework for the suppression of women).
While liberals claim that carbon is the scourge of the Earth, I believe that honor goes to Muslims in general. And liberals who turn a blind eye to Muslim sexism and sexual abuse aren’t far behind.
Of course, it would be unfair to show Muslim sexism when it's part of all major religions:
Buddhism
In an interview, the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhists said there was no reason why a future Dalai Lama could not be a woman – but she would have to be good looking otherwise she would be "not much use". [13]
...some of the earliest and most systematic documentation of rejection of female sexuality in Indian literature is from Buddhist scriptures, especially the rules of monastic discipline (Vinaya Pitaka), traditionally attributed to the Buddha himself.
...There are more rules for nuns (bhikkunis) than monks (bhikkus), 331 as against 227, because while everyone has to control their desires, women have the additional burden of not "arousing the desires of men."
...the Buddha states, "Of all the scents that can enslave, none is more lethal than that of a woman. Of all the tastes that can enslave, none is more lethal than that of a woman.
...Monks are advised to walk straight, without moving their arms and bodies too much, looking at the ground and not above, lest they get enchanted by "the glance of a woman."
...The texts repeatedly describe celibate monks as embodiments of dhamma (the path of enlightenment) while the lustful insatiable women are described as embodiments of samsara (the cycle of death and rebirths).
...By the time Islam arrived, Buddhism had already waned in most of India. But the Buddhist idea equating women's sexuality with entrapment and pollution informed Hindu monastic orders (mathas), especially those instituted by Adi Shankara. [14]
Hinduism
"A donkey is like a woman. It toils all day and sometimes has to give up food and water," a 2006 Hindi textbook from the Rajasthan Education Board read. "In fact, the donkey is a shade better, for while the housewife may sometimes complain and walk off to her parents' home, you'll never catch the donkey being disloyal to his master."
...In 2015, in Central India's Chhattisgarh, a teacher complained about a textbook which said women stole men's jobs, according to the Indian Express. The textbook, aimed at 15-year-olds, stated that "working women are one of the causes of unemployment in the country". [15]
Sexual intercourse with a girl below the age of 18 is considered rape. But since child marriages are not illegal, a man can legally have sex with his wife even if she is a minor, as long as she is above the age of 15. Further, marital rape is not criminalised in India.
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act: Women are still not equal guardians of their children. A father is considered the "natural guardian" of a child, although the custody of offspring under the age of 5 will ordinarily be awarded to the mother. [16]
...In traditional Indian culture, girls are groomed to be good wives, not independent women with their own careers. Traditional values say women are only important not in their own right, but because they produce children and preserve culture.
This mentality leads families to treat them as objects who should remain pure and be controlled: women are their fathers' property, and later their husbands'. Parents worry so much about "losing face" in the community that while boys have all the freedom they want, girls are constantly advised not to do anything that would "bring shame". This mentality explains why so many are forced into marriages, or even murdered by their own parents.
...In Bollywood films, men routinely chase and harass women. As SA Aiyar points out in the Times of India, old-time villain Ranjeet did close to 100 rape scenes, "with the audience almost cheering him on". The message from Bollywood is almost always that if you harass a woman enough, "no matter how often she says no, she'll ultimately say yes". [17]
Sikhism
A devout Sikh who attempted to rape a woman with Down's syndrome after following her home may have targeted other victims, police have warned.
Harjit Singh, 45, was branded a 'predator' by police after he was jailed for more than six years for singling out vulnerable victims.
He also attacked two women at the Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead, north London. [18]
Two Sikh priests have been jailed for a total of 12 years for raping a 26-year-old Glasgow prostitute after she refused to have sex with them.
...The Singhs, both married and with three children each still living in India, had been in Scotland only a short period - to work at the temple in Glasgow's St Andrews Drive - before the attack in the city centre in April. [19]
Judaism
Israeli airline employees cannot ask women to change seats to spare a man from having to sit next to them, a Jerusalem court ruled on Wednesday, handing down a groundbreaking decision in a case brought by a woman in her 80s.
Strictly religious Jewish men who refuse to sit next to women, for fear of even inadvertent contact that could be considered immodest, are a growing phenomenon... [20]
Israeli culture can also be slightly schizophrenic. Tel Aviv may tilt toward equal rights, but conservative Jerusalem is still heavily influenced by religious parties. Ultra-orthodox newspapers, which typically don't publish pictures of women, refuse even to print Livni's photograph. Livni, 50, would probably ordinarily laugh off the policy except that Haredi voters comprise a growing portion of the electorate, up to 15 percent. Livni will likely need to depend on the support of even small religious parties if she expects to form a governing coalition. [21]
Christianity/Catholicism
The Vatican refers to the ordination of women as "a grave scandal" in our Church.
Often, I think how we, as Catholics, were silent when our schools were segregated; not questioning why black members of our Church had to sit in the back pews. As a priest, I have learned that when there is injustice, our silence is the voice of complicity. Sexism, like racism, is a sin. [22]
Pope Francis has ruled out a woman ever serving as a priest in the Roman Catholic church.
The declaration is not a change in stance for the Argentinean pope, who has always said the door was closed on women being ordained as priests.
But when he was asked and then pressed on the matter by a Swedish journalist during a press conference onboard the papal plane, Francis suggested the ban would be eternal.
"Saint Pope John Paul II had the last clear word on this and it stands, this stands," Francis said in his initial response, referring to a 1994 document stating that women could never join the priesthood. [23]
...For all the remarkable service that the Catholic Church performs, it is one of the world's dominant and most unshakable patriarchies, with tenets that don't abet equality.
...But the church's refusal to follow some other Christian denominations and ordain women undermines any progress toward equality that it trumpets or tries. Sexism is embedded in its structure, its flow chart.
...When pressed about that by an Italian reporter last year, he [Pope Francis] reminded her that "women were taken from a rib."
Was he ribbing her? He laughed and said so. But the metaphor remains, and it casts women as offshoots, even afterthoughts. [24]
Christian fundamentalist schools are teaching children creationism is fact, that gay people are "unnatural" and that girls must submit to men, according to a series of claims.
...Called Accelerated Christian Education schools (ACE), the schools originate from an education system developed in southern Baptist states in the US which has developed off-shoots around the world including in Britain.
Textbooks say of the role of women and girls and society: "God has given both the husband and the wife certain areas of responsibility in the home. The husband is to be the leader of the home, loving his wife even as Christ loved the church...The wife is to obey, respect and submit to the leadership of her husband, serving as a helper to him...She is available all times day or night."
A section titled 'Testimony of a Homemaker' in one textbook reads: "God desires for me to submit to my husband, train up my children, see that my house is properly supplied, pray without ceasing, teach other women to love their husbands and children, and be discreet, pure and a keeper of my home."
Former pupil Cheryl Povey who attended an ACE school in Bath, said: "I came across a lot of sexism. I remember as a girl finding it quite shocking. We were taught that if you're a woman, you should be subservient to men; your husband, your pastor and other male figures. [25]
I never adhered to this type of view, even though it's impressed upon Christian girls from childhood. Men—fathers—are always viewed as leaders of the household, addressed as the head of the family. Sermons casually mention a woman's need to remain "pure" before marriage or talk about the importance of a mother taking care of her family in the home. The insinuations start off relatively subtle. But by time you're actually married, people in fundamentalist churches start explicitly discussing the fact that if you’re a "real" Christian home, the husband is supposed to be in charge. Anything to the contrary is borderline blasphemy. [26]
Billy Graham famously refused to meet, travel, or dine with a woman alone. The presumed reasoning behind this rule was that Graham did not want to create the conditions that might lead to any extramarital dalliances or, given Graham's ministry, the mere appearance of any impropriety that would harm his ability to win souls to Christ. Many, many evangelical pastors and laymen still follow some version of this rule.
...it's increasingly recognized that the Billy Graham Rule is sexist in practice if not in theory. Because the leadership in evangelical churches is almost entirely male, the Billy Graham Rule has served to stifle the development and discipleship of female members of the Church. All too often in evangelical churches, men are afforded opportunities to meet individually with their pastors for deep theological discussions over coffee or beers while women are herded into a "moms' group" or other all-female gatherings.
Second, the Billy Graham Rule reinforces the sexist notion that women have less to contribute to the life of the Church. [27]
And yes, I'm aware of the various interpretations by anthropologists about the goddess worship in past cultures. And while such things do exist, it's more of an add-on instead of an operating system. In 5000 years of sketchy human history (aside from the 21st century), the dominant power structure has always been created by and for men. That's not accidental. That's intentional.
Why? Because GSIGs fear female empowerment. Why? Because it would lead to the end of their unethical conquest of humanity. Why? Because true female power has all the attributes of men, none of their weaknesses, and the ability to create life. That's a major threat to the GSIG power structure. Hence, the use of religions in all cultures to intentionally suppress female empowerment.
The fact that there are women in major religions is a contradiction and testament of how good GSIG conditioning has been for thousands of years. Google "Christian feminism" and see for yourself. These Christian feminists are delusional. They believe that they're going to create significant change in the church. Sorry, but that's not happening.
The fact that traditional women are proud to be part of Christian religions means that they prefer a passive and submissive lifestyle. And that's just sad. Aside from your specific purpose in this lifetime, you didn't incarnate to live a submissive lifestyle. How long will it take for Christian women to understand this?
And yes, many religious women also have stable financial jobs. But in the home, behind closed doors, many women prefer to play the role of the other as Simone de Beauvoir puts it in her philosophical writings.
Then again, de Beauvoir is obsessed with philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and only feels that she has value when he's around her. Ah...so many contradictions, so many layers of conditioning, and an infinite amount of space on the internet to talk about it.
The same is true for Christian conspiracy theorists (especially Alex Jones). Jones is a Christian who defends family values (though that's debatable since he vilifies his ex-wife). While he's definitely not a friend to the feminist movement, he's just as sexist as other Christian conspiracy theorists.
Talking to Megyn Kelly about US President Trump, Jones asks her if she would sit on Trumps lap. [28] Kelly has to laugh it off as a joke, as does Jones. But Jones would never ask a man if he would sit in Hilary Clinton's lap.
In one video, Jones compares Kelly to the gorgon Medusa, saying "I dare not look directly at her." [29] Really? Would he say the same thing about a male reporter? Of course not. And his associate Roger Stone is just as bad:
Stone previously tweeted...New York Times columnist Gail Collins is an "elitist c*nt," MSNBC host Rachel Maddow is "Rachel the muff-diver," Fox News' Megyn Kelly has a "nice set of cans,” and Fox's Allen West is an "arrogant know-it-all negro." He mocked writer Charles Krauthammer for being paralyzed, and tweeted "DIE b*tch" at former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson. [30]
Aside from Jones' Infowars, Stone still gets major play in mainstream media outlets and alternative liberal media outlets. To be fair to liberals, Stone is a provocateur. He uses the above statements to intentionally piss you off and to stand out from the pack. And it works. Sadly, if you want to win an election in the 21st century, you have a better chance of winning if you have Roger Stone on your side.
Contrary to what you may believe, most Christians like their women weak, passive, and submissive. Why are Christian male conspiracy theorists against women? Because they feel threatened by real women in power. They're threatened by women who don't need men. They're threatened by women who are fully empowered.
Why are they threatened? Because Christianity has a strong basis in sexism. It's part of the GSIG script. Why? Because GSIGs feel threatened by women. Why? Maybe their reptilian overlords have an irrational fear of the female energy.
Or, maybe it's a rational fear where a matriarchal society in the past doesn't fall for the usual bullsh*t conditioning of male GSIGs and their extraterrestrial overlords. Who knows?
The only middle ground for women in the conspiracy theory movement is the new age movement. But even there, you'll find people channeling so-called various extraterrestrials telling the crowd that men are dominant to women and that’s the natural way it should be. Umm...what?
But generally speaking, the new age movement is the safest place for women and female empowerment. Why not feminism? I'm glad you asked, because that's our next subheading.
Feminism
Feminism is such a huge issue that it deserves its own series. But I'll touch on most of the significant topics here. Where do we begin? Why not with Gloria Steinem? Steinem is a second wave feminist and a former CIA agent. She even defends the CIA:
In my experience The Agency was completely different from its image; it was liberal, nonviolent and honorable. [31]
The only problem with that statement is that it's completely false. During the 1950s and '60s the CIA overthrows democratically elected governments around the world. Aside from that, they attempt to destroy the black civil rights movement.
In the mind of most Christian conspiracy theorists, the CIA is using feminism to further their goals. And what goals would that be? The suppression of female empowerment of course. After women are given the opportunity to serve as support staff during WWII, they have a difficult time readjusting when the men come home.
Hence, the second wave of feminism, freeing women from the home. The problem is that when you remove religion completely, the extreme is atheism. And in the world of atheism, everything goes. And that's when the porn industry really takes off.
Feminists of the past convince women to throw off their traditional shackles and get into porn and celebrate the human body. And what do men at the time think? They love it.
Most men in the past and today love to have a traditional woman in the house, watching women in porn on the internet, and having one dirty mistress/prostitute to release their home life tensions. That's the trifecta for most men in the past and today.
Allow me to be clear. I'm saying that the feminist movement is indirectly responsible for the pornography movement we have today in the 21st century (with men in the porn industry as being directly responsible). Today, we have women from broken homes and broken families entering the porn industry.
Personally, I see pornography as a new cage for women. Contrary to what you may think, porn is not a female empowering ideology. It's just exploitation for men. Yes, women can argue that instead of men using women's sexuality against them (like in religions), the porn industry is empowering them to use it for themselves. I can understand that argument. Women have the right to use their own sexuality for their own benefit.
But does that act increase or decrease their overall value? If you're a prostitute, do you really value yourself? I hope so, because men definitely don't value prostitutes at all. It doesn't matter if the money is good. Generally speaking, men have zero respect for prostitutes (while still having some respect for the woman as a human being). If a prostitute dies tomorrow, most men wouldn't bat an eye.
The same is true of sluts (promiscuous women who have casual sex). Again, generally speaking, men have little to zero respect for sluts (again, still having some respect for the woman as a human being). If a slut dies tomorrow, most men won't lose any sleep over it.
And from these two examples, feminist would claim that men should have respect for a prostitute or a slut and value them as integral members of society. And that's the issue. Should men have respect for a prostitute or slut? I'm not here to tell you what to do. I'm just here to ask some deep questions, make you aware of a few ideologies and actions, and let you take it from there.
Personally speaking, no, I don't think men should have much respect for prostitutes or sluts. What? You're a horrible person. I hope you burn in hell. Yes, that would be the usual feminist reaction.
Though I grow up in a Catholic and Christian household during my childhood and teenage years, I'm more into flaky new age ideologies where people are consciousness, not their skin or body. Why does a person choose to incarnate as male or female? You'll have to ask the individual.
Whatever choice we make prior to incarnating on the Earth in regards to sex, that path will enable us to have unique experiences. It's not good or bad to a man or woman in theory. Unfortunately, if you're born in the wrong place at the wrong time, that theory goes right out the window as you experience the harshness of human society.
Don't get me wrong though. If you need porn and prostitution to pay the bills for your child/children, do what you have to do. When you have a child, your happiness should take a backseat to the wellbeing of your child.
If you feel that you need to stay in porn or prostitution for awhile (even a few years) to keep things stable for your child, then do it, and do it without feeling any guilt.
Providing the basic necessities of life for your child is one of the most sacred and important things that you can do as a mother. If you do nothing right at all on this planet, providing your child with the basic necessities of life is a strong characteristic on your resume.
The reason why I don't respect prostitutes or sluts (aside from those that are doing it for their child) is because they don't value themselves. They're just another commodity in the minds of men. Aside from all the reasons you incarnate on this planet, you don't incarnate to be a sexual commodity for men.
The only reason why you may think otherwise is because the GSIG conditioning at every level of society has been so good. It's up to prostitutes, sluts, and women in traditional marriages to start valuing themselves.
And don't get me wrong about being a stay at home mother. If you want stay at home for a few years or longer, great. As long as it's your choice, without conditioning. And this is where it gets complicated. Conditioning exists all around you (religious, cultural, and societal). But it's up to you whether you allow that conditioning to make the choices for you.
The problem is that it's more or less impossible to tell who’s making the real choices (the conditioning or you).
Do we really believe that Muslim women who defend their submissive status are the ones speaking?
Do we really believe that Christian women who defend their second tier status as empowering as the ones really speaking?
In reality, it's most likely the conditioning that's talking. Of course, the conditioning is only making the choice because the woman is allowing it to do so.
If your partner doesn't see you as an equal, you need to drop him like a sack of potatoes. If you’re partner insists on a prenuptial agreement (which I'll insist on), if you have your own assets, you should insist on your own prenup as well. Why? Why not? Fair is fair. You hope for the best, but have backup plans for the worst.
You can't have backup plans when you get married. In theory yes, that's true. In 21st century reality, you better have backup plans. If not, you'll lose everything in the potential divorce and work a sh*tty job to pay the alimony.
But let's really get into marriage equality. If you're a woman, and your male partner doesn't go down on you (eating out), but you go down on him (blow jobs)...you need to start considering divorce. Why? Because he doesn't value you as an equal.
You don't have to start the divorce proceedings immediately. Demand that he goes down on you. It doesn't matter if he likes it or not. You deserve to be treated like the queen that you are. If he says no, start planning for divorce proceedings in your mind and go from there. Don't bother with the therapy. If you can't communicate to your partner as adults, your marriage is already dead.
And then there are the implications for traditional women. I won't break up my family over such things. Don't get me wrong. I'm very pro-family. But I'm also pro-female empowerment. Being unequal in a traditional religious household only hurts you. You can pretend that it doesn't, but just before you go to sleep, when all your defenses are down, when all the masks are off, you'll feel the pain.
I'm here to tell you that it's not worth it. You didn't incarnate on this planet for your partner to treat you as an inferior being. The only reason why you may think so is because you've been indoctrinated to follow GSIG conditioning (via religion in this case).
But the current solution is also a trap. F*ck religion. Do whatever feels right and express your sexual freedom to the world. Yah...no. You don't need to go to the extremes of atheism/Epicureanism. There is a middle path. What is this path? As I mentioned before, I'm not here to tell you what to do. I don't know you or the circumstances you're going through.
If you need help deciding on which path to take in life, you need to start trusting your own intuition. How do you do that? By using radical dualism (see Philosophy of Mind in Philosophy Reborn Part I: Purpose and Autoimmune Diseases for Everyone in Part IV: Naturally Unhealthy Big Pharma & Big Media).
Personally, I don't like weak women who rely on men to protect them. A small woman with toned muscles and proper training is quite capable of dealing with any threat. I believe that all women should learn how to use deadly weapons and common objects as a deadly weapon. Those bullsh*t self defense workshops are useless against a man with adrenaline in his body and the desire to rape.
From high school and up, I believe that all women should be trained in deadly martial arts for free. And it makes sense. Women are the most vulnerable group to physical or sexual violence. It's only rational to train them in the deadly arts.
Women don't have to join the league of assassins, but they should be strong enough to hold their own, and knowledgeable enough to assess the situation and know what action to take.
I don't want my future wife to be weak. I want her strong enough to never be a victim of physical or sexual violence. I want her to know how to shoot all guns and how to throw a knife. I want her to know when a man is trying to manipulate her emotionally or mentally. It's unknown if I'll ever find such a woman, but it's nice to dream.
Women need to remember that most men feel threatened by fully empowered women. I'm talking about women who can give birth on their own without the help of doctors, hospital staff, or a midwife. I'm talking about women who don't need a man for anything, but still choose to be with one to enjoy life.
And men realized this thousands of years ago. That's why they created ideological scripts to suppress and control female empowerment. And that's why the conspiracy against women is so strong. Aside from thousands of years of conditioning (esoteric images) and ideological constructs, it's still ongoing today in every aspect of global society.
Let me give you an example of how bad it is today. Let's pretend that rape and sexual assault are legal for adults. It's a horrible thought but just pretend. Using today's mindset, what's going to happen? Most men will rape women every day at a global level. Why? Because they can.
It's only because of todays laws that most men don't commit such acts (though the punishments are very weak). It's not because of a strong sense of ethics. It's because of the legal system and the enforcement of sexual assault laws. That's all that stands between mass global rape and today's law abiding men.
And in this hypothetical scenario, what would women do? Instead of taking matters into their own hands and becoming the women of Sin City (2005), today's women would most likely play the subservient role. Why? Because that's how they've been conditioned for all of time, continuing in the 21st century.
Sadly, most women accept their subservient undervalued role in WE society. While there are exceptions with strong women who can handle themselves, most choose subservience. Why? Aside from convenience, the GSIG conditioning (all scripts) is very good and very effective today.
Contrary to what you may believe, most feminists today don't believe in female empowerment at all. They believe in new cages that serve the interests of men in power. Is feminism a GSIG script? No. But like all movements, it has been infiltrated by GSIGs.
The first wave of feminists is understandable in their desire to vote as equals. But the second and third wave has been corrupted by GSIGs. Instead of empowerment, they advocate that women are victims of male patriarchy at every moment of their lives.
While patriarchy is still the dominant ideology in the 21st century, claiming that women are victims is going too far. It's more accurate to say that women are conditioned by patriarchal ideologies. And for whatever reason, they choose to go along with it.
This is what today's feminist movement doesn't like, personal responsibility. Did you get blacked out drunk and wake up to find a guy inside of you? You're a victim. Yes, you are, but just because you can get blacked out drunk doesn't mean that you should. Is getting blacked out drunk an example of female empowerment? No.
What about drinking and driving? A man chooses to get drunk and causes a fatal accident. He can't say that I chose to get drunk, but I'm not responsible for the fatal accidental I caused. That won't work in the courts.
But as soon as a woman takes a sip of alcohol, in the eyes of the courts and feminists, she's not responsible for any of her actions. To be clear, I'm not saying that a man who rapes a drunk woman isn't at fault. He is. His action of rape is the cause. But a woman who chooses to get blacked out drunk is also a significant influence.
WE prosecutors, liberals, and feminists believe that as soon as alcohol enters the system, a woman is a victim and can't consent. When men drink alcohol, they're held accountable for all of their actions. That's a double standard. And that's disingenuous.
In reality, millions of people around the world are drinking alcohol and having consensual sex right now. These bullsh*t laws are in place to condition women to play the victim card any chance they get. That's not female empowerment. That's GSIG conditioning to suppress female empowerment. And again, that's not accidental. That's intentional.
I'll give you another example. A woman goes down on a man (blow job). None of his hands are touching the woman. She regrets the act and files a sexual assault claim. Because of feminists, the prosecutor will claim that the man emotionally manipulates her (without touching).
Even though the woman consents to the act (no alcohol involved in this example), feminists and the prosecutor will argue that she couldn't really give consent because of patriarchal emotional manipulation. Umm...what?
That's how bad feminists want to destroy women's ideology of personal responsibility. In the mind of feminists, female empowerment only exists in terms of finances and jobs. But it ceases to exist as soon as a relationship with a man begins.
That implies that women are competent to do jobs and manage money, but not competent in terms of a relationship. That's not empowerment. That's just a new modified cage for women pushed by the feminist movement. And that's not accidental. That's intentional.
More so, the feminist movement decries any type of independent healing. Once a victim always a victim. Only a support group of feminists can help you. Umm...what? First wave feminists would decry what feminism has become today. Sadly, it's nothing more than a GSIG script being played out.
If you choose to give up your personal responsibility for your actions, that's on you. If you're not making decisions with your own mind, GSIG conditioning will do it for you. And if you're playing out GSIG conditioning, you have no genuine purpose in this lifetime.
Some feminists love to cling to their myths. And yes, I'd love a female myth story about the grand times of female empowerment. But it doesn't exist in the historical record. To be fair to feminists, humans have been alive in our modern forms for at least 200,000 years.
The fact that we only have 5000 years of sketchy human history (aside from the 21st century), can be the silver lining for feminists. Maybe a female empowered society does exist prior to that. Many women around the world would love a wonder woman myth.
But just to be clear, the wonder woman comic/movie character is merely created as eye candy for male readers/viewers. Wonder woman is nothing more than a sexual object hiding behind the claim of female empowerment.
I'll be honest. I sometimes hold my tongue in criticizing women online or in person. Why? It's not because I'm a liberal puppet. I'm very much against feminism and conservative on many issues. But I'm aware of the history of chronic GSIG conditioning of women in every aspect of society.
When your sex/gender is seen as second class for thousands of years, that does something to you. You can pretend that it doesn't affect you. You can rationalize and compartmentalize it, but you can never dismiss it.
While holding my tongue may be disingenuous, I can't ignore thousands of years of GSIG conditioning of women. Women all around the world are trying to find a way out of this global GSIG conditioning, only to escape into another GSIG script/cage.
I empathize with that. But I also want women to understand the history of conditioning so women can take back their sex/gender. Being male, I don't want to overplay my hand in telling women what they should be doing. But I'll lay out a few possible steps that can lead to true female empowerment.
Step 1: Women need to want/desire true female empowerment.
Step 2: Women need to be aware of the conditioning at every level in global society in the past and present.
Step 3: Women need to create an organization with a set of principles that represents female empowerment regardless of the effects on current society (marriage, politics, religion). Ex. 1. Woman giving birth via natural birth, no doctors, hospital staff, midwives (single birth, mother in great health). Ex. 2. Choosing not to be a victim forever. Things go bad, but you don't have to be a victim for life. Accept that all actions either have no meaning, or there's meaning in all actions. It's one or the other.
Step 4: At least 80% of members must agree on these principles. Sexism in religion, politics, marriage, and work environment can't be tolerated. No lukewarm women in this organization. No religious feminists. No feminists who keep women shackled to unempowered feminist ideologies.
Step 5: Instead of women being dependent on the organization for help, they are encouraged to be responsible for their own lives and expressing female empowerment in their own way. The organization only offers tools to empower women, not dependence.
Step 6: Women need to be trained in all deadly martial arts for protection (hand to hand, knives, pressure points, guns, mental assessment of the situation...and such). I recommend Krav Maga as the foundation.
Step 7: Men will react badly to female empowerment and create groups to demonize them (worse than it is now). Women must be able to endure all of this. Women must recognize these circumstances as an opportunity for mental, emotional, physical, and spiritual growth. No one said that overcoming 5000 years of patriarchy was going to be easy.
Step 8: These men will demonize other men who support them. Men who support female empowerment can't remain silent. They will have to make their voices heard (online, blogs, books, all with their real names, no anonymity).
If you're a woman and desire female empowerment, you don't have to follow these steps to the letter. It's just a light guiding framework. But above all, to the female readers, your growth and the growth of all women on the planet has a lot of space to grow. You're not at your final and best form in 2017. You have lots of room to grow and discover/create your best form.
In 2017, true female empowerment doesn't exist anywhere on the planet. Nor has it existed for 5000 years of sketchy human history (aside from the 21st century). Just so you know, a true female empowerment movement will take at least a decade to make significant change. But like all movements, it requires a beginning. It requires the desire of true female empowerment by a few like-minded individuals.
To my female friends, you need to remember that you're not here to serve the interests of men through religion, politics, marriage, sexual promiscuity, or prostitution.
You're here to express your consciousness to the best of your abilities in the female form.
You're not here to be caged by patriarchal ideologies.
You're here to break those ideological cages and usher in a new era for female empowerment.
Remember, you have all the abilities of men, none of our weaknesses, and the ability to create life. You should be queens that stand at the top of humanity. Why are you settling for less?
Though I have a lot more to say about the feminist movement, I'm pushing over 7000 words already and I'm not even halfway through this article. I'll save the rest for a future article on the feminist movement.
Atheism & Science
Atheism is the backbone of science and the scientific method today. Why? Because atheists believe that only physical matter can cause other things to exist. Why? Because atheism is just neo-Epicureanism.
Aside from filling ones pleasures and desires, Epicureans believe that humans don't experience death because the afterlife doesn't exist in their mind. Only physical matter exists. And these ideologies are merely a continuation of Democritus' works. You see how it's all connected?
But one common thing between these thousand year old threads is that as great as science and evolution is, women don't really count as human. From an atheist perspective, women exist for the self-interest of men and the procreation of the human species. That's it.
It's only in the last few decades that it's common sense to see women as equal with men. To be fair, women will never really be equal to men. Why not? Because women have the advantage of being able to create life. Hence, the scales should always tip in a woman's favor. Unfortunately, that reality has been intentionally distorted by GISG conditioning via religion, atheism, and science.
Contrary to what you may believe, atheism and the blind dogmatism of science is a man's game. Women are allowed entrance only because of political correctness. Why? Because most atheist men believe that women are inferior and that the science proves it. Of course, they don't come out and say that today because they would be vilified, but from time to time, they tire of keeping up the facade. Don't believe me? See for yourself:
Hers and other atheist/skeptic blogs were soon flooded with comments. Many women told of receiving unwanted sexual advances at freethinker gatherings. Some men, meanwhile, ridiculed Watson as overly sensitive or worse — or threatened her with rape, mutilation and murder.
...Many acknowledge they have a "woman problem" — men outnumber women at atheist gatherings, both at the podium and in the audiences. [32]
...Many of the most prominent leaders of the New Atheism are quick to express deeply sexist ideas. Despite their supposed love of science and rationality, many of them are nearly as quick as their religious counterparts to abandon reason in order to justify regressive views about women.
Sam Harris...during the interview she asked him why most atheists are male. "There's something about that critical posture that is to some degree intrinsically male and more attractive to guys than to women." He added, "The atheist variable just has this—it doesn't obviously have this nurturing, coherence-building extra estrogen vibe that you would want by default if you wanted to attract as many women as men."
...Dawkins has spent the past few years using Twitter as a platform to rail against feminists for daring to speak up about sexual harassment and abuse. He not only rushed to Shermer's defense regarding allegations of sexual assault, but rushed to Harris' defense regarding allegations of sexism, even though Harris' sexism is so off the charts it becomes downright comical.
...People like Dawkins, Shermer and Harris are the public face of atheism. And that public face is one that is defensively and irrationally sexist. It's not only turning women away from atheism, it's discrediting the idea that atheists are actually people who argue from a position of rationality. How can they be, when they cling to the ancient, irrational tradition of treating women like they aren't quite as human as men? [33]
At the 2013 Women in Secularism conference, Ron Lindsay, CEO of the Center for Inquiry, gave what was widely regarded as a condescending lecture to the women in attendance, accusing them of feminist bullying.
...It seems to me, judging from recent events, that atheist men are the fragile flowers here—they, not women, are the ones wilting under criticism. Perhaps they can't stand it that women are withholding that "extra estrogen vibe" that used to make conferences so much fun.
Why would women join a movement led by sexists and populated by trolls? If this is atheism, I'm becoming a Catholic. [34]
...But after a few years of blogging, podcasting, and speaking at skeptics' conferences, I began to get emails from strangers who detailed their sexual fantasies about me. I was occasionally grabbed and groped without consent at events. And then I made the grave mistake of responding to a fellow skeptic's YouTube video.
The response from male atheists was overwhelming. This is one example:
"honestly, and i mean HONESTLY...you deserve to be raped and tortured and killed.
...I started checking out the social media profiles of the people sending me these messages, and learned that they were often adults who were active in the skeptic and atheist communities. They were reading the same blogs as I was and attending the same events. These were "my people," and they were the worst.
Dawkins' seal of approval only encouraged the haters. My YouTube page and many of my videos were flooded with rape "jokes," threats, objectifying insults, and slurs. A few individuals sent me hundreds of messages, promising to never leave me alone.
...Twitter accounts were made in my name and used to tweet horrible things to celebrities and my friends. (The worst accounts were deleted by Twitter, but some, such as this one, are allowed to remain so long as they remove my name.) Entire blogs were created about me, obsessively cataloging everything I’ve ever said... [35]
The atheist movement – a loosely-knit community of conference-goers, advocacy organizations, writers and activists – has been wracked by infighting the last few years over its persistent gender imbalance and the causes of it. Many female atheists have explained that they don't get more involved because of the casual sexism endemic to the movement: parts of it see nothing problematic about hosting conferences with all-male speakers or having all-male leadership – and that's before you get to the vitriolic and dangerous sexual harassment, online and of, that's designed to intimidate women into silence.
...Blogger and author Greta Christina told me, "I can't tell you how many women, people of color, other marginalized people I've talked with who’ve told me, 'I'm an atheist, but I don't want anything to do with organized atheism if these guys [Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris] are the leaders.'" [36]
The trouble with the atheist movement, of which I consider myself a part, is that sometimes it just looks far too much like religion.
...Richard Dawkins, the late Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and Daniel Dennett, are often referred to as atheism's 'four horsemen'. All deeply interesting individuals - but also exactly the sort of faces that a patriarchal religion might appoint as its elders. [37]
...In the atheism movement, social Darwinism has played out as the justifiable assault of women by (naturally) aggressive men.
...James Randi, chair of annual atheist gathering The Amaz!ng Meeting (TAM), used biological essentialism to rationalize alleged sex crimes and sexual harassment.
...The idea that sexual harassment and violence is just "what men do" is the 21st-century atheist’s interpretation of the laddist maxim that "Boys will be boys."
...The mirroring of religion is apparent in the movement's structural hierarchy. White men are at the top, serving as featured speakers at events and figureheads of the movement. Everyone else remains in the pews and balconies. This social stratification is both sexist and racist. [38]
If you're a female atheist, I'm trying to tell you that most atheist men believe that you exist for the pleasures of men and procreation of the species. Nothing more. Again, atheism is just neo-Epicureanism. They took everything from epicureans except the simple living and replaced it with the male evolutionary desire to dominate women.
Allow me to be clear. Atheist men would have sex with numerous women and toss them out like whores because that's the way they believe that nature/evolution works. Of course, they won't say it like that. But that's what they really beleive.
To atheist women, all of your dreams, hopes, and desires are meaningless in the mind of atheist men. Of course, your dream, hopes, and desires do have meaning if you're into spirituality. What do you say ladies? Wanna join the flaky new age movement and weed through the garbage and genuine tidbits of knowledge via your own intuition?
What do you have to lose? Nothing. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain. If you're not sure where to begin I recommend radical dualism (see Philosophy of Mind in Part I and Autoimmune Diseases for Everyone in Part IV).
And just so you're aware, this blatant sexism isn't confined to atheists. Many scientists are just as sexist:
The peer reviewer's suggestion that two female researchers find "one or two male biologists" to co-author and help them strengthen a manuscript they had written and submitted to a journal unleashed an avalanche of disbelief and disgust on Twitter. [39]
See Sexism in Part II: Social Humanities for more examples.
Again, whether it's religious men, atheist men, or male scientists...most of them have a vested interest in suppressing female empowerment. It's just different GSIG scripts following one dominant GSIG script in play for over 5000 years. And that's not accidental. That's intentional.
Whether it's religion, atheism, or feminism...they're just new cages to suppress female empowerment. How long are you going to suppress what you know to be true? How long are you going to stay inside of your ideological bubble?
Again, most male scientists only see women as sex objects as a means of stress reduction for them and their super important scientific work. To my female friends, how long is it going to take before you peel back the illusions you have about atheism, academia, and science and finally see them for what they really are? Sexist institutions that serve the interests of men.
The Justice/Legal System
I'll keep this subheading short and sweet. The current WE justice/legal system is not one that serves the interest of female empowerment. While a justice system isn't supposed to serve any agenda aside from justice, that's only in theory. In reality, it prioritizes protecting men until their defense of them becomes completely ludicrous. Don't believe me? See for yourself:
In 2009, Joseph Wills asked Helen Pearson on a date.
She declined.
Then the stalking began.
...she reported the threats to the police. She reached out to them 125 times over five years to report this unrelenting harassment campaign. The abuse got so bad, Pearson said, that she considered suicide. "Every night you go to bed and you don’t know what is going to happen and you constantly live in fear," she told the BBC.
...That horrifying reality almost came to pass on Oct. 21, 2013. That night, Wills attacked Pearson with a pair of scissors in a nearby graveyard as she walked to the gym. Onlookers said they saw Wills drag Pearson into the cemetery by the hood of her coat. Pearson was stabbed eight times in her back, face and neck. She was saved by a witness, who jumped out of his car and shoved Wills away.
Wills was arrested, tried and found guilty of attempted murder and sentenced to life in prison. [40]
In December 2010, Magali walked into a Quebec City police station to accuse her stepfather of sexual abuse.
It was another four years before the case came to trial; Magali grew angry and frustrated at the delays.
That was two years ago. She faced an even bigger shock this spring. The man she accused of hurting her, at whose trial she had twice testified, was granted a stay of proceedings. [41]
But to 36-year-old Rastogi's dismay, the top charge against Abhishek was reduced from felony assault to felony accessory after the fact, with an accompanying misdemeanor of "offensive touching."
Fein noted that the plea calls for a six-month jail term, though only 30 days of actual incarceration, with the balance served in the weekend-work program, doing manual labor for eight-hour shifts but otherwise at liberty.
She declared herself doubly victimized by her husband and by the criminal justice system. She wondered aloud how someone arrested for a crime could be charged with being accessory after the fact without being charged with the crime itself, even though he was the only possible perpetrator. She also made it known that she is offended by the charge of offensive touching. [42]
A man has walked free from court after pleading guilty to the rape of a 12-year-old girl. [43]
The Globe and Mail spent 20 months investigating how Canadian police services handle sexual-assault investigations. As part of the reporting, The Globe looked at the rate at which police dismiss sex-assault complaints as unfounded, meaning the investigating officer does not believe a crime occurred. The data showed that, on average, one out of every five sex-assault cases is classified as unfounded. [44]
Contrary to what feminists want you to believe, there is such a thing as false sexual assault/rape allegations. While there's a lot of unreported sexual assault allegations, most of it wouldn't survive the legal standard of beyond reasonable doubt. I'll get into both of these issues when I write/post the feminism series online (estimated date mid 2018).
And the injustice continues:
Baugh sent Stacey Dean Rambold to prison for 30 days last year after he pleaded guilty to sexual intercourse without consent.
Rambold was a 47-year-old business teacher at Billings Senior High School at the time of the 2007 rape. The victim was one of his students. She committed suicide while the case was pending trial. [45]
Sir Young, 20, pleaded guilty to raping the girl at their Booker T. Washington High School in Dallas when he was 18, even as she told him "no" and "stop", according to the Dallas News .
But State District Judge Jeanine Howard stunned many when she opted for probation, which will include 45 days in jail, and also exempted him from standard sex-offender restrictions, such as staying away from children, attending sex offender treatment, undergoing a sex offender evaluation or refraining from watching pornography. [46]
A high school teacher gets 30 days in jail for rape? A female judge gives a confessed rapist 45 days in jail? Really? Clearly, the GSIG conditioning of women isn't just good. It's unbelievable.
And the injustice continues:
An Edmonton-area man found not guilty earlier this year of sexually assaulting his stepdaughter will stand trial again, following a decision by the Alberta Court of Appeal Wednesday.
In a split decision, the three-judge panel ordered a new trial after finding the original judge relied on myths and stereotypes in the behaviour of sexual assault victims.
...During the trial in February 2016, the stepdaughter told Justice Terry Clackson her stepfather sexually assaulted her on a regular basis for six years, beginning when she was in Grade 4. [47]
In 1979, the North Carolina Supreme Court made a ruling that continues to reverberate today: A man can't be guilty of rape if the woman first consented to sex — even if she later asks him to stop. [48]
And from time to time, there are cases that look like female empowerment, but are really new cages for women. Don't believe me? See for yourself:
A wealthy ex-wife is demanding a huge divorce settlement from her former husband so that she can maintain her lavish lifestyle.
...A trial is currently underway to determine how much she will receive, with Mrs Stephenson seeking $5million a year from her ex-husband.
...Stephenson would need $433,991 'net' in monthly maintenance to maintain the standard of living she had become accustomed to.
...Mrs Stephenson signed a prenuptial agreement before the couple married in 1991, but the document said that monthly maintenance would be up for negotiation if the marriage lasted more than seven years.
...Her testimony said she was accustomed to a full social life during her marriage, in which she regularly ate out, and attended concerts, Broadway plays and sporting events. [49]
Alicia Stephenson is seeking more than $400,000 a month, plus a stake in other assets, from Richard Stephenson, whom she married in 1991. Her lawyer, Elizabeth Felt Wakeman, has argued during the trial that her client is entitled to maintain the lifestyle she enjoyed during the marriage, which included multiple homes, private jets and parties with celebrities. [50]
A former supermodel has been awarded £75million from her Saudi billionaire ex-husband after one of the highest-stakes divorce battles of its kind.
Christina Estrada wanted £196million from businessman Sheikh Walid Juffali to meet her 'reasonable needs' - which included two luxury houses, a huge clothes budget and five cars.
...The awards means Ms Estrada, who already has a home in Beverly Hills, will get £2.5million to spend each year as well as £18million to buy a lavish property in London.
...The case astonished many after Ms Estrada claimed her 'needs' included £1million for clothes, £40,000 for fur coats, £109,000 for haute couture dresses and £21,000 for shoes every year.
She also said she needed enough from her ex-husband to afford a luxury home in London worth about £60million, a £4.4 million house in the country at Henley, as well as £495,000 for five cars - three in London and two in the US. [51]
[Mariah] Carey, however, takes a different tack: instead of relying on Jessica Fletcher to help her through this difficult period, she is allegedly demanding that Packer stump up $50m as an "inconvenience fee".
"He moved her across the country and relocated her and her kids," someone described as a member of Carey's entourage told the US press. "She wants an inconvenience fee."
As anyone who has ever moved in their life knows, with or without twins named Monroe and Moroccan, $50m is small potatoes for the inconvenience involved. Personally, I reckon Carey should ask for $100m plus an entirely new wardrobe... [52]
The ex-wife of a green energy tycoon has been awarded a "modest" divorce payment of £300,000, despite her former husband starting his business a decade after they split up.
Kathleen Wyatt had earlier demanded a £1.9 million payout from Dale Vince, a former New Age traveller, although she did not lodge a maintenance claim until more than 25 years after they had separated, and nearly 20 years after their divorce. [53]
A couple involved in Britain's biggest divorce award will not be identified after a judge ordered their names should never be made public.
The husband in the case, a City trader, has been told to hand over £453 million to his estranged wife and mother of his two children. [54]
Allow me to be clear. To all my female friends, you're not entitled to live a life of luxury if you're no longer with the person that creates that life of luxury. I'm not saying that you don't deserve anything. You deserve the general standard of living in a divorce settlement.
What is the general cost of a regular (non-luxurious) house cost in the country? What is the general cost of food, transportation, and health care? Whatever it is, that's what you should be awarded by the courts.
If you're a woman in debt after a divorce, it's most likely because you're currently living beyond your means. You believe that you're entitled to continue your life of luxury. Such thinking doesn't represent empowerment. It’s just gaming the system.
By doing so, you're only proving the ideologies of sexist men. Women are vindictive gold diggers and will take all of your money in the divorce. It's part of their nature. I'll never trust a woman again. I'll never treat them as equals. As you can see, you're only propagating the current sexist ideologies.
I'm not saying that you deserve the lowest standard of living. I'm saying that you deserve a standard of living based on the average lifestyle in the country. Not poor, not luxurious, but comfortable and good enough to live on.
If you're a socialite and believe that you're entitled to a life of luxury after your divorce, you're not strengthening women's rights. You're hurting the female empowerment movement and valuing yourself as a commodity to be bought, sold, and traded. Judges that award socialites luxury divorce payments are keeping women unempowered with feminists cheering them on. And that's not accidental. That's intentional.
And just so you know, most men who marry socialites do so for surface reason...for appearances. Look at me and my lifestyle. Look at my beautiful wife. She only cost $10 million, not including potential divorce proceedings.
While many socialites enjoy the rich and luxurious lifestyle, in the eyes of their husbands or rich men in general, they're just commodities to be bought, sold, and traded. This is just another line in the GSIG script of female conditioning.
This is not female empowerment. This is a shiny and beautiful cage for women. Sadly, the cage is so beautiful that women prefer it instead of real empowerment. That's not accidental. That's intentional GSIG conditioning.
Continued in Part 2.
References:
[1] After gang rape trial, Austria toughens up on migrants denied asylum. Associated Press. March 5, 2017.
[2] Al-Othman, Hannah. Asylum seeker is arrested after 'abusing EIGHTEEN women' during a two-hour train journey in Germany. Daily Mail. February 8, 2017.
[3] Shaheen, Kareem. Dozens of Syrians forced into sexual slavery in derelict Lebanese house. Guardian. April 30, 2016.
[4] Callimachi, Rukmini. To Maintain Supply of Sex Slaves, ISIS Pushes Birth Control. New York Times. March 12, 2016.
[5] Ulrich, Amanda. Women say Muslim-majority areas in French suburbs are now NO-GO areas for females where they are banned from mixing with men and must dress conservatively. Daily Mail. December 14, 2016.
[6] German prosecutors press murder charges in Freiburg student's killing. DW. March 30, 2017.
[7] Hall, John. Saudi preacher who 'raped and tortured' his five -year-old daughter to death is released after paying 'blood money.' Independent. February 4, 2013.
[8] Muslim Swedish pol quits after refusing to shake women’s hands. Agence France-Presse. April 20, 2016.
[9] Nair, Roshini. Port Coquitlam imam convicted of sexual assault sentenced to three and a half years in jail. CBC News. May 22, 2017.
[10] McLaughlin, Elly and Parry, Hannah. Michigan doctor and her cohorts may have cut the genitals of as many as a HUNDRED girls, prosecutors tell the court in historic case against practice. Daily Mail. June 8, 2017.
[11] Non-Muslim Americans wear hijab in solidarity for World Hijab Day. BBC News. February 2, 2017.
[12] German Women Against Trump Chant "Allahu Akbar." YouTube video. Posted by: NrxZionistLibertarian, January 22, 2017.
[13] Gayle, Damien. Dalai Lama's 'sexist' quip ruffles equality activists. Guardian. September 24, 2015.
[14] Pattanaik, Devdutt. There's a misogynist aspect of Buddhism that nobody talks about. Quartz. January 6, 2016.
[15] Ross, Eleanor. Five Times India's Textbooks Have Been Terribly Sexist. Newsweek. April 17, 2017.
[16] Madhok, Diksha. Indian women will never be equal as long as these 9 laws remain on the books. Quartz. June 25, 2014.
[17] Hundal, Sunny. India's bitter culture of rape and violence. Guardian. January 3, 2013.
[18] Burke, Dave. Devout Sikh, 45, who attempted to rape a woman with Down's syndrome after following her home 'may have other victims.' Daily Mail. October 12, 2016.
[19] Two Sikh priests jailed for rape of Glasgow prostitute. BBC News. November 22, 2012.
[20] Kershner, Isabel. Israeli Woman Who Sued El Al for Sexism Wins Landmark Ruling. New York Times. June 21, 2017.
[21] Despite Livni's Rise, Sexism Alive in Israel. Newsweek. September 23, 2008.
[22] Bourgeois, Roy. Sexism and the Roman Catholic Church. SF Gate. June 8, 2012.
[23] Kirchgaessner, Stephanie. Pope Francis says women will never be Roman Catholic priests. Guardian. November 1, 2016.
[24] Bruni, Frank. Catholicism Undervalues Women. New York Times. May 6, 2015.
[25] Fenton, Siobhan. Christian fundamentalist schools teaching girls they must obey men. Independent. June 5, 2016.
[26] Martin, Jennifer C. How Sexism in the Church Almost Ruined My Life. Jezebel. October 26, 2015.
[27] Exum, Andrew. Mike Pence and the 'Billy Graham Rule.' Atlantic. March 30, 2017.
[28] Megyn Kelly Visits Alex Jones At Infowars Studios. YouTube video. Posted by: The Alex Jones Channel, June 6, 2017.
[29] Megyn Kelly In Alex Jones' Studio. YouTube video. Posted by: The Alex Jones Channel, June 12, 2017.
[30] Here Are More Sexist And Racist Tweets Trump Ally Roger Stone Might Want To Delete. Media Matters. April 22, 2016.
[31] Kounalakis, Markos. Commentary: The feminist was a spook. Sacramento Bee. October 25, 2015.
[32] Winston, Kimberly. Do Atheists Have A Sexism Problem? Religion News Service. September 15, 2011.
[33] Marcotte, Amanda. Atheism's shocking woman problem: What’s behind the misogyny of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris? Alternet. October 3, 2014.
[34] Pollitt, Katha. Atheists Show Their Sexist Side. Nation. September 24, 2014.
[35] Watson, Rebecca. It Stands to Reason, Skeptics Can Be Sexist Too. Slate. October 24, 2012.
[36] Lee, Adam. Richard Dawkins has lost it: ignorant sexism gives atheists a bad name. Guardian. September 18, 2014.
[37] Smurthwaite, Kate. Atheism is an old boys' club. More women should admit to being Godless. Telegraph. January 7, 2016.
[38] Bianco, Marcie. Brazen sexism is pushing women out of America's atheism movement. Quartz. February 12, 2016.
[39] Bernstein, Rachel. PLOS ONE ousts reviewer, editor after sexist peer-review storm. Science Magazine. May 1, 2015.
[40] Erickson, Amanda. A woman called the police about her stalker 125 times. Then he stabbed her. Washington Post. July 1, 2017.
[41] MacKinnon, Catou. After 4 years of waiting, her alleged abuser was finally brought to trial — then charges were stayed. CBC News. June 12, 2017.
[42] Daly, Michael. Silicon Valley CEO Pleads 'No Contest' to Abusing His Wife—and Is Offered a Deal for Less Than 30 Days in Jail. Daily Beast. April 17, 2017.
[43] Man, 21 who admitted raping a 12-year-old walks free. Daily Mail. March17, 2017.
[44] Doolittle, Robyn. The Challenge of Handling Sex Assault in Canada's North. Globe and Mail. February 28, 2017.
[45] Montana Supreme Court reprimands judge for rape comments. Associated Press. July 23, 2014.
[46] Judge Jeanine Howard sparks outrage for saying sexually assaulted 14-year-old 'not the victim she claimed to be.' News Corp Australia. May 5, 2014.
[47] Keeler, Nola. New sexual assault trial ordered on grounds Edmonton judge relied on myths, stereotypes. CBC News. July 19, 2017.
[48] Ortiz, Erik. North Carolina Legal Loophole Prevents Women From Withdrawing Consent to Sex. NBC News. June 23, 2017.
[49] Al-Othman, Hannah. Estranged wife of healthcare millionaire demands $5MILLION a year in divorce battle so she can keep her three homes, two boats and trips on private jets. Daily Mail. November 2, 2016.
[50] Marrazzo, Amanda. Cancer center founder's divorce drags on after lawyer misses court deadlines. Chicago Tribune. April 26, 2017.
[51] Spillett, Richard. I've won how much! Delight of ex-model who wanted £196million from her Saudi billionaire ex as she gets 'just' £75million - barely enough to pay for ONE of the houses she demanded. Daily Mail. July 8, 2016.
[52] Freeman, Hadley. Mariah Carey wants $50m from her ex – and it only makes me love her more. Guardian. November 12, 2016.
[53] Millionaire tycoon's ex-wife awarded six figure payout even though he made his fortune a decade after they split. Telegraph. June 10, 2016.
[54] Sawer, Patrick. Judge orders City trader to pay ex-wife £453m in biggest UK divorce award. Telegraph. May 11, 2017.
[55] Crawford, Alison. Bob Paulson apologizes for 'egregious behaviour,' nudity at RCMP bomb school. CBC News. July 14, 2016.
[56] Milewski, Terry. Harassment in Canada's military tolerated by leadership, former justice finds. CBC News. April 30, 2015.
[57] Perkel, Colin. Landmark deal in RCMP sexual-harassment class action wins court approval. Canadian Press. May 31, 2017.
[58] Poisson, Jayme and McLean, Jesse. Peel police’s sexual-harassment records revealed: records. Toronto Star. November 30, 2015.
[59] Sexual harassment lawsuit against former RCMP spokesman Tim Shields settled. Canadian Press. February 18, 2017.
[60] Atwan, Shachar. Sexism and Aggression: What We Learn From Israeli Army T-shirts. Haaretz. January 2, 2017.
[61] Gillis, Wendy. Study highlights barriers faced by police officers who become mothers. Toronto Star. April 17, 2017.
[62] Bueckert, Kate. Women claim workplace sexual assault, harassment in $167M lawsuit against Waterloo Regional Police. CBC News. June 1, 2017.
[63] Cudmore, James. Royal Military College head apologizes for cadets' behaviour at harassment seminars. CBC News. May 21, 2015.
[64] Butler, Colin. Male police culture puts women at a disadvantage, study suggests. CBC News. September 1, 2016.
[65] Plato. Timaeus. 42a
[66] Timaeus. 42c
[67] Plato. Laws. 781b
[68] Martosko, David. Hillary Clinton says all female sexual-assault accusers 'have the right to be believed' but skips over accused child rapist she defended in the 1970s – and what of Bill's 'bimbo eruptions'? Daily Mail. September 15, 2015.
[69] Twohey, Megan. How Hillary Clinton Grappled With Bill Clinton's Infidelity, and His Accusers. New York Times. October 2, 2016.
[70] Melania Trump and Hillary Clinton: Shaming accusers? BBC News. October 18, 2016.
[71] Sanchez, Raf. Monica Lewinsky: Hillary Clinton 'blamed the woman' for Bill Clinton's affair. Telegraph. May 6, 2014.
[72] Atlas Shrugged: Part I. 2011. Box Office Mojo.
[73] Atlas Shrugged: Part II. 2012. Box Office Mojo.
[74] Atlas Shrugged: Part III Who Is John Galt. 2014. Box Office Mojo.
[75] Edell, Celia. Here's What Sexism in Higher Ed Looks Like – And Why It's a Problem. Everyday Feminism. February 24, 2017.
[76] Academia needs to confront sexism. Science Magazine. July 14, 2017.
[77] Bates, Laura. Female academics face huge sexist bias – no wonder there are so few of them. Guardian. February 13, 2015.
[78] Sherouse, Beth. The Price Women Pay: Sexism and Power in Academia. Auntie Bellum Magazine: An Honest, Unapologetic Voice for Southern Women. June 27, 2017.
[79] Meara, Ellen. Yes, I Got Tenure — And A Lot Of Grief Along The Way. WBUR. March 29, 2016.
[80] Canadian ski federation accused of muzzling athletes who were allegedly abused. La Presse. February 25, 2017.
[81] Woman says ex-ski coach Bertrand Charest stuck hands down her pants when she was 16. Canadian Press. March 8, 2017.
[82] Witness at Charest trial says ex-ski coach slept with her when she was 15. Canadian Press. March 14, 2017.
[83] Olympic medallist accuses USA Gymnastics physician of sexual abuse. Associated Press. September 12, 2016.
[84] Murphy, Dan. Testimony against Larry Nassar continues at sexual abuse hearing. ESPN. May 26, 2017.
[85] Connor, Tracey. Gymnastics Doctor Larry Nassar Faces Sex-Abuse Accusers in Court. NBC News. May 12, 2017.
[86] Connor, Tracey and Lane, Christopher. Gymnastics Abuse Scandal: Dr. Larry Nassar Pleads Guilty to Child Porn. NBC News. July 11, 2017.
[87] Quigley, Aidan. After Sexual Assault Scandal, Ousted U.S. Gymnastics Leader Gets Big Payday. Newsweek. June 2, 2017.
[88] Amanda Seyfried: "I Was Being Paid 10 Percent Of What My Male Co-Star Was Getting." Hollywood Reporter. July 14, 2015.
[89] Setoodeh, Ramin. Equal Pay Revolution: How Top Actresses Are Finally Fighting Back. Variety. November 10, 2015.
[90] Carroll, Rory. Women in Hollywood: plenty of talk but little change on equal pay. Guardian. December 29, 2015.
[91] Polone, Gavin. Gavin Polone: Why Women Really Make Less Money in Hollywood (and How to Fight Back). Hollywood Reporter. March 16, 2017.
[92] Mintz, Luke. Hollywood's gender pay gap is 'crazy': Natalie Portman. Reuters. January 12, 2017.
[93] Spratt, James. Hollywood's pay gap: is the film industry becoming more equal? London Evening Standard. July 21, 2017.
[94] Whiteman, Bobbie. 'Grateful and happy!': Gal Gadot says she is content with her less than super-hero sized $300,000 paycheck for blockbuster Wonder Woman. Daily Mail. June 28, 2017.
[95] Browne, Kit Simpson. Just How Much Was Robert Downey Jr Paid For His Avengers Appearances? Movie Pilot. July 8, 2016.
[96] Wonder Woman. 2017. Box Office Mojo.
[97] Iron Man. 2008. Box Office Mojo.
[98] Reddish, David. The 15 Most Expensive Screenplays Ever...And the Stories Behind Them. Screen Rant. June 19, 2016.
[99] Basic Instinct. 1992. Box Office Mojo.
[100] A Knight’s Tale. 2001. Box Office Mojo.
[101] Panic Room. 2002. Box Office Mojo.
[102] Evan Almighty. 2007. Box Office Mojo.
[103] McDonagh, Ross. 'I'm in trouble...where's the door?' Goldie Hawn recalls casting couch encounter with 45-year-old cartoonist when she was just 19. Daily Mail. May 11, 2017.
[104] Jones, Ellen E. 'We warn each other': how casting-couch culture endures in Hollywood. Guardian. July 18, 2017.
[105] Benner, Katie. Women in Tech Speak Frankly on Culture of Harassment. New York Times. June 30, 2017.
[106] Newcomb, Alyssa. Silicon Valley Grapples With How to Fix a Sexist Culture. NBC News. July 26, 2017.
[107] Freeman, Mike. Qualcomm enters $19.5 million gender bias settlement. San Diego Union Tribune. July 26, 2016.
[108] Plaugic, Lizzie. Twitter is facing a class action lawsuit for gender discrimination. Verge. March 21, 2015.
[109] Simon-Lewis, Alexandra. What is Silicon Valley's problem with women? Wired. June 12, 2017.
[110] Levin, Sam. She took on Tesla for discrimination. Now others are speaking up. 'It's too big to deny.' Guardian. July 5, 2017.
[111] Wright, Matthew. Real Time host Bill Maher is accused of crossing the line with tasteless incest joke about Ivanka Trump. Daily Mail. May 7, 2017.
[112] Jimmy Dore: Sentenced to Live. New Wave Entertainment Television. 2015.